Jump to content

JEN722

Members
  • Content Count

    1,092
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by JEN722

  1. I am pretty sure the pylons you are looking are included in the Cutting Edge F-104S conversion kit. That would be a much better option than the ancient and rough Esci parts. Jens
  2. If you have an pair of leftover afterburners from the Tamiya F-16C block 30/40/50 they will fit the F-14B too. They are very close to having the same diameter. Jens
  3. You are right in stating that only the last TEN (10) RF-4Bs had the thicker/bulged wings. Unfortunately many references mention 12 - probably from the same incorrect source. Jens
  4. The new Kinetic F-16AM really need a new correct fin base. The one in the kit is way too fat - more like a C/D fin base. Jens
  5. Why is it that you add the radome before the windscreen? You seem to have done so on both your F-4Bs. Jens
  6. All our (i.e. Danish) F-16A/Bs got the Mid-Life Update. Some of our F-16s are rather block 50-like now with l/e beer cans, reinforcement plates and HG-like finish. Jens
  7. No, they did not! All our block 1/5/10 airframes retained the smaller stabs. Also, the stab upgrade had nothing to do with MLU. Jens
  8. As for an F-105F (or early F-105G) it is quite easy to remove the ECM bulges from the HB kit. I did that on mine. Jens
  9. I am talking about the chord, not the thickness. Jens
  10. The HB F-105D tail is ok. It's the G tail that needs a leading edge enlargement. Jens
  11. FWIW the exhaust nozzles from the Tamiya F-16C fit the F-14 almost perfectly. Jens
  12. Added to that is the fact that some of the photos appear more than once in the book, and some are photoshopped to look different to previous ones. Jens
  13. The ResKit cockpits look great. What does the canopy profile look like? I have read that is was corrected, but other sources state the canopy has not been changed. Jens
  14. It's kinda hard to tell from your pictures, but that Academy tail fin tip looks more like the C/D tip than the A/B tip. I think it can be corrected with a bit of sanding. Jens
  15. I don't know why you keep going on about FS36622. It's pale grey, almost dirty white, and it's nowhere near FS36231 in which the real cockpits are painted. Your best suggestion has been XF-19 which, although lighter than FS36231, is fairly good for a scale effect cockpit grey. Jens
  16. I am not sure what you are trying to tell me. Also, I'm pretty sure I don't need to know. Fact is, XF-19 is too dark to be similar to FS36622. Jens
  17. Using Vallejo paint charts as a reference is bound to go wrong. Vallejo can't even match their own colours to acceptable real life standards. Jens
  18. XF-19 is nowhere pale enough to be FS36622. Jens
  19. https://www.hannants.co.uk/product/AASQ48020?result-token=wX58X
  20. If you compare the light grey (with white markings) to other grey aircraft in the same picture it is quite obvious that the colour is lighter than FS16473 but not too far away (although not similar to) FS36375. I would paint it FS36440 any day, but I would be sure to pick one of the versions that is more blueish than brownish. Btw, I have compared it to an F-106, an F-15 and a TPS A-4. Jens
  21. I agree on FS36307. Compare it to the grey (36307) on the F-5E in the background. Jens
  22. Doh! That's probably where I got the photo from. 😆 Jens
  23. Here is a mix of tails. I have no date or anything though. Jens
  24. Thanks Dave. I think I will go for an almost empty cabin then. Jens
×
×
  • Create New...