Jump to content
ARC Discussion Forums

Just call me Ray

Members
  • Content Count

    228
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Just call me Ray

  • Rank
    Tenax Sniffer (Open a window!)
  • Birthday 05/13/1985

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://
  • ICQ
    0

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Denver, Colorado (near KAPA)
  • Interests
    Uhh, I come here, so what do you think?

Recent Profile Visitors

2,598 profile views
  1. A noble life well-lived. Godspeed Sgt. Basset and thank you for this build
  2. ...we still have the "we are not worthy" emoji right? DAAAAUUUUUUYYYYYYYYUUUUUUUUMMMMMM!!!!! 😲
  3. Do it! If I try it it's just gonna be another glue bomb😡
  4. It just occurred to me that I've been coming to this place (or at least registered here) for something like two decades now! Yet I don't remember any 20 year anniversary announcements, is that still coming up or did I miss it? I have to think that would be a pretty BIGthing!
  5. I'm just really blown away by this one in particular!
  6. If I can interject...sometimes real names are just boring 🙂 Plus a lot of the user names here have a lot of personal or professional (or both!) significance. Me...I'm really boring and my user name quite simply tells you as it is 🙂
  7. Ha, I remember reading about these things way back in the day! In addition to the Twin Cub here, there was a Twin Pacer made by Wagner. Rather than simply join two Cubs/Pacers at the wing spar, it was a single-fuselage Pacer with a custom-made twin engine mount up front (imagine similar to the Twin Cub). Here's a link with more information and pictures: http://www.aviastar.org/air/usa/wagner_twinpacer.php It seems Wagner may have also contrived a Twin Ercoupe, returning to the Twin Cub's method of construction (joining two fuselages together along the wing spar). In all three cases it seems that Wagner was trying to simply create a very practical, easy-to-fly twin for entry-level pilots rather than simply doing it for the novelty, based on my (really super-quick) research.
  8. I haven't seen too many, a quick look at the last time I remember being at Micheal's, most of the kits there were in the $15-20 range.
  9. I have specific interests, but they're more than a bit outside what ARC typically covers. I'm just looking to see if there are any general opportunities out there in the meantime, or even shift gears entirely into.
  10. Hi! I think I asked this same question a while ago, but here goes again. I'm just wondering if anybody on the boards here has any connections to the publishing industry (in any form) that they'd be willing to let me take advantage of. I know a lot of you put in hours and hours on research to the point where you can just about write the book yourself and...I don't know, maybe that's something I could help make happen? I know that sounded like a business pitch but I haven't exactly had the best track record of that. I'd rather just be employed by someone already set up.
  11. NO KIDDING! I haven't built a model in a long time because I just got priced out of the hobby! Like southwestforests said, just the increase in inflation is a pretty significant increase! I think it's incredibly hard for kids to get into it nowadays because of the expense, and the frustration a lot of them have when they end up with a glue bomb after all that expense and time. That's why it's so great seeing veteran model builders take up mentor roles! I've seen miracles from these types of people! One consolation is younger people getting into drone piloting which...at least is something? That's its own can of worms of course. You open up a Revell and you don't find any worms in there, although the sprue trees can certainly look like it!
  12. Test; haven't been here in a while! I see it decided I need a new avatar That one took me a few hours in MS Paint (and I'm not putting up a meme or a joke this is serious!) Also I need to update my location I'm close to KFTG now
  13. I'd like to know if you guys can recommend me some YouTube channels that specialize in OOB model kit reviews. Now, yeah, I know there are a lot of unboxing review videos but I'm looking for channels that actually do completed model builds and give very in-depth reviews of them.
  14. I actually have a question about the P-47M; Wikipedia says that the biggest difference is to create a faster lighter version and part of that was reducing armament to six guns, but all photographic evidence I can find seems to suggest the eight gun configuration was retained. I'm inclined to think Wikipedia is wrong then, so what was the biggest distinction between the M and other bubble-tops?
  15. I clearly remember this kit sometimes being called one of the worst ever molded, especially since there's a big sticky topic about it in the prop forum. I also remember the glue bomb mine turned into. Beautiful work!
×
×
  • Create New...