Jump to content

Vince Maddux

Members
  • Content Count

    956
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Vince Maddux

  • Rank
    who needs instructions
  • Birthday 10/05/1975

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Stepville Ala

Recent Profile Visitors

12,762 profile views
  1. I have 1/1 scale drawings that can be scaled down.
  2. Not to long ago the Air Force had a training squadron at Fort Rucker. They flew TH-1s.
  3. I wish Maxwell could keep the C-130s and do the MH-139 training, there is plenty of ramp space and its not like Maxwell is a very active base, aircraft wise. Every time I went there on days that there wasn't an airshow, all the C-130s where parked in front of the BX
  4. I like it but I wish they took the blue all the was to the start of the radome
  5. For me its the YF-23, that whole plane looks like it came from the future and still does.
  6. I didn't think about the C172 Skyhawk and the Cessna 150! I have flown both several times although I never went for my pilots license. They where easy a lots of fun to fly.
  7. Me too, But I also love the T-37/A-37 and the Monogram kit
  8. The Monogram kit has noting to do with the older T-37 kits or the Aurora A-37 kit.
  9. Since we are doing odd and favorite threads how about your favorite trainer. Something different for the "Fighter Mafia" My top three: t-37 T-6 Yak-130
  10. NM, that's for the main cheatline
  11. In the NASA graphics standard manual it does list it as FS15102.
  12. I noticed it wasn't sold, do you still have it?
  13. Now here is a really bad two seater to single seater , The Hawk 200. couldn't they just take a standard hawk and replace the rear seat with a fuel tank or something?
  14. To slightly mirror the topic about what plane looks strange with it's landing gear down, How about this? What planes look bad as a two seater, or what plane plane looks better as a family model? For me I like all twin seaters ...... well except the TF-102, that looks way off.
×
×
  • Create New...