vesthepes
-
Content Count
326 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
No winners were ever pronounced for this one, right?
-
You feel this way, other may feel different. I believe it would be better if we avoid stating our opinion in political matters. You might insult someone or feel insulted...
-
There is too much confusion with this kit alone already. Yes I got it and it's nice in many ways, but it's neither RB nor RBT. The box cover has a different nose than it is supplied on the sprues. If nothing else that's odd. So which nose can we expect, when they announce the RB?
-
My bad. I was looking at CADs and it seemed like an early chute housing
-
And as Dave already said, you will have to modify the parabrake housing. The kit provides you with an early style RB chute housing.
-
Thanks Berkut. That means SyAAF flew RBTs. Was that an upgraded RB or a new aircraft production type?
-
So... If I understand correctly this should be the RBT and not RB, right? "Photos are courtesy of Luftwaffe A.S."
-
It would be nice if they included the RWR blisters and MERs for the Iraqi RBT as well as English stencils, but I am completely satisfied with what's given. I'm ordering one for sure.
-
Great to be back. Thanks for making it happen.
-
Great GB, big thanks to Vince for the opportunity. It's been a pleasure.
-
1:48 Trumpeter J-8II, PLAAF. #81192 from the Hainan Island incident
-
Thanks guys! Last photos before putting it to gallery. Still have some details to take care off; the canopy, parts of the landing gear and finish it with a photo session. Unfortunately I haven't had enough time to finish the Sabre before the dead line. Took me a lot of hours these days to finish this one... Thanks for looking in
-
The decals are on...
-
Hvala Dragane I used X-1 Tamiya white but over a dark brown panel line pre-shading. I also masked some panels to break the one tone effect. next step decals, weathering, landing gear, PL-8s and a whole bunch of details... stay tuned
-
...and a few more