Jump to content

streetstream

Members
  • Content Count

    590
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by streetstream

  1. I'm not getting any malware, i just don't like internet shopping, but i will charge my Paypal and give it a try.
  2. Thanks for the advice. I noticed that one too, but i don't know if the site can be trusted. On the other hand, it's only 10 bucks.
  3. Sadly i don't have the maint. Manual for the A310. I have the 2 volumes of component location training manual and the ATA 100 index for the A310-200 and A310-300. i also have the airplane caracteristics for airport planning.
  4. Well, i only could look at it for 5 minutes so i haven't had time to check all the info, but together with the airport planning manuals that AV O has provided, i did get a lot of info. Still haven't got a nice profile drawing, but i think that was reaching a bit to far. I hope to process the info soon, because at the end of this year, i would like to start my 1/144 A310 and one day buy the 1/72 A310.
  5. Well, friday i bought a few manuals. It has a lot of illustrations on possitioning of doors, hatches, the lot.
  6. Couldn't agree more. Just do what Hawk10 said. Nothing more, nothing less.
  7. Thanks everyone for your input. I'm still missing high detail profile drawings, but as been pointed out, there might be a chance that those don't exsist. I have some basic profile drawings, so i can get a sense of what it should look like and i got some really good info on door placement and engine size (thanks to AV O).
  8. First of all, thank you for the input. By good, I indeed mean accurate. As for the availability or excistance of the drawings i search, i will rely on your experience. But i found this video (link below) were a person is building a large A380 model and he has some (not all) drawings including cross sections. I was mostly interessed in a profile of these planes, but cross sections also help. I'm also looking for the location of pitot tubes and sensors. Maybe that is available?
  9. Does anybody know where i can find good airliners scale drawings. I'm always surprised to see that people have such great drawings. Now i'm looking for drawings for all mayor airliners but most of all for the A310 and A330/340. Thanks in advance
  10. Keep in mind that the title states MI-29 and you are looking for MI-24 pictures. I, be reading the title alone, tought you needed Mig 29 pictures.
  11. What a nice paintjob and weathering. That plane looks real menacing.
  12. Are you serious? You brushed that? It looks really good.
  13. Indeed, if you use waterbased paint, a wash is a safe option aswell. But only when using waterbased paints.
  14. I would do a little bit of drybrushing. It is a relative risk free method because you can build up in small steps. Just try your brush on a piece of sprue first.
  15. That is a very nice build. I love the MD-11 (and the dc-10 for that matter). But if i can ad my 2 cents, i would ad a bit of weathering especially to the landing gears.
  16. Great comebacks. I'm thoroughly impressed. Keep playing your game like you are to smart for this discussion, but fact is, you can't answer any question i ask and you can't quote me on all the BS you claim i wrote. Now, i'm through with you and this stupid discussion. If you keep incisting that a grounding is an indication of just a small teething problem, go ahead. I don't buy it and despite you claims that they simply need to swap the batteries, we are almost 2 weeks further and it hasn't happend.
  17. Well since you like facts so much, here's one for you: Despite you claiming that the only thing Boeing has to do is swapping the batteries, the 787 is still grounded and i didn't hear Boeing making a statement that they've cracked it.
  18. I see now. If i don't work on the 787 i can't say that i find it a serious problem when one of their types get grounded. Somebody else can come here and claim that everything is fine and that the grounding is just a small teething problem with just the same information. Explain to me the difference?
  19. Ye I never said nobody else can cause a plane to crash, but no matter what you say, when in flight the only factors that matter are a plane and it's pilot and how they act. Jesus, how can you not understand that. Or do i have to mention Al qaida tpo as a factor in airl travel because they can hijack planes and crash them in the WTC? My example was on the performance of a plane and if a pilot can still fly the plane after a certain parts failure or not. In the DC 10 case, the plane in about 30 of the time couldn't be safed no matter what. in the A330's case, if the pilot knew what he was supp
  20. No matter what you say, when you are flying a plane you have to factors, the plane and the pilot. Or do you think pilots have constant communication with the FAA when they are in trouble? Ofcourse it takes alot more than that to operate an airline, but when you are flying a plane, and something goes wrong, you have simply a plane and a pilot. Either one can cause the crash. That was the point i was trying to get accross. Seeing how you make comparisons and how you can always disagree with a person without making any argument or even make statements in my name without ever being able to quo
  21. Nice, you can always say how pople are wrong, but never even give an argument. What is next? Call me ignorant again? Make comparisons that don't ad up? Ignoring evry question i ask?
  22. That is you only deffence and you call me ignorant? No correction? No nothing? The pitot only sends information to the fly by wire computer to make autopilot possible. That's why the autopilot on the Air France jet disconnected. In manuel flight it only acts as a speedo. So you agree that if there is a factor that can make the plane crash with 100 certainty and that factor can happen regualary, the plane is unsafe and should be grounded and the problem fixed. That is what happend with the DC 10. it had a factor that made it crash and it could occur at any time. Now the Boeing is groun
  23. All system on a plane have to be approved by the FAA before the plane gets cirtified. So whay your saying is that the FAA first claims that the systems onboard are in order, than make an announcement that the batteries in the plane did more than enough testtime on the bench and are satisfied by them and all of a sudden would ground them because it is a new system? And in making that statement you are acting in a way that you accuse me of doing, namemy making assumptions. You are assuming that the FAA is biased over new technology even when they tested it over and over again and were satisfie
  24. Am i a bad person if i agree with this. That flag on the tail really doesn't work. The overall color of the fuselage is good, but the artwork could have been better.
×
×
  • Create New...