-
Content Count
170 -
Joined
-
Last visited
About harvy5
-
Rank
Rivet Counter
- Birthday 03/24/1975
Profile Information
-
Gender
Male
Recent Profile Visitors
The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.
-
MBD-2 only tested.Not suitable for precise bombing. They were mainly used 2xODAB-500 and in night plus 2xOSAB-100 or 4xOFAB-250 or 4xRBK-250.FAB-500-62 used mainly Su-17. The first versions of the Su-25 could not combine different types bombs and rockets.The same was one type rockets or cannon pods. See my link and file Afghanistan. In file vyzbroj are details weapons.
-
Typically, there were two drop tanks on outside wet racks. Outside racks 2xB-8,S-24 or S-25 and inside 4xbombs 250kg or 2x500kg or 2xCH-29L. If was used 4xCh-ML,was drop tanks on inside wet racks. https://ulozto.sk/folder/fpfD7sUp5Xjt/name/Su-25
-
No, there were none in Afghanistan. The R-195 engines were used only on the T8-15 prototype, presented at the Paris air show in 1989, and on the BM version. The last few Su-25s produced also had the ability to use these engines. But not used, and the rebuilding of the older version was abandoned
-
OK, I misspelled it. From production, they were unpainted.During overhaul, they should be sprayed gray or in the color of the bottom surfaces. But it depends on the factory.
-
Neither sand nor gray color. It is the color of anodized AL alloy. AL color sprayed with transparent yellow... 😁
-
It's ShittyHawk! One set of pylons missing!The model is only for the version with KKR. or me, HB is a better choice.
- 1 reply
-
- missing part number
- which is which?
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Under the fuselage can be loaded on MBD3 5x100kg or 4x250kg bombs
- 2 replies
-
- su-22m4 fitter-k
- fitter
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Kitty Hawk Su-30MK build review - Finally done - Part 5 is here!
harvy5 replied to jgrease's topic in Jet Modeling
Another ShittyHawk. For a lot of money a bad model and needs a lot of aftermarkets. Moreover, it is again MIX ALL VERSIONS. 🤮 -
After a long long time resuscitating this topic. Kitty Hawk announced the release of Su-22, so I waited. Big misteake!This model has only good windshield.So I finish Eduard and buy another Su-22 from Hobby Boss. Old photo from the building are here. https://www.britmodeller.com/forums/index.php?/topic/234971868-148-su-1722m-3-fitter-j-eduardkitty-hawk/ And the current appearance of the Su-22M-3 with an R-29 engine ... .. small detail, position lights have two colored bulbs ... ... and weapons. 4xR-13.
-
Continued... It was easier . I decided on red 08. All UTG was rebuild Su-25UB.Camo therefore a must for UB ... I sprayed all surfaces with light grey blue. And finally camouflage. PLS don't use camo from instruction!!! All are bad. And I provided them with complete documentation for all camo .... 🥵 This camo is only for red 08. I starting.... Small detail to stabilizers.On the top is a stabilizer for Su-25UB.UTG, T. To be continued .......
-
I started building this model a long time ago. So just a few details from the construction. Originally it was to be for UBM Peru. But when Kovozávody Prostejov released their version,I couldn't resist buying it. But it was a big mistake!!! From resin correction parts is OK only hook. Stabilizers are right and have the right shape, but bad profile. I had prepared for UBM, so I use them.I added some details on rudder and new covers before airbrakes. Need adjusted fairings for flaps and made new fairinds control ailerons.
-
Your idea is Su-17M-3 or M-4 from Afghanistan? For the Su-17M-4 in Afghanistan was the standard for recon missions only KKR-1 . Sometimes drop tanks, but they were not needed. They flew on short missions. For night is sometimes used bombs OsAB-100 or FP-100. OsAB-100 is 100kg parachute lighting bomb and FP-100 (photo-patron) is flash bomb. But they weren't very effective and revealed the position of recon plane. On combat missions carred usually cluster bombs RBK-500. Under belly remained pylons for KKR. Unlike M-3 had all M-4 in Afghanistan in additio
-
I sen you PM.
-
Gabor. Mr. Sulc said Thursday , F version will be maybe in September next year. https://www.eduard.com/eduard-nazivo-u-artura/
-
SRY of writing and now, I had a lot of work. The front of the fuselage have HB and KH almost the same. The difference is in the middle and rear of the fuselage. There is a KH completely out. For me KH is just nicely created sh..t. Bad shapes and bad angles.Missing parts. Well, I need a lot of aftermarkets. I have a nice army pension, money is no problem. But why should I invest in repairs? For the price of KH with need aftermarkets I have two HB. And the result is almost the same. In addition, there is not as much work on HB as on KH