Jump to content
ARC Discussion Forums


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Niels

  1. Nice! And you're afraid F-111 sheets wouldn't sell πŸ˜„
  2. Nice! Any reprints in the June round to? (Guess you would have listed them, but have to ask πŸ˜‰ )
  3. Niiiiiice! Been waiting for this one 😁
  4. Wouldn't mind Dark Vipers Pt 3 with all the "new" ANG units now transitioning to HG5 scheme. These are some of those seen during last year; 177FW 119FS AF87-0225 - really like the units HG5 markings! 149FW 182FS AF86-0262 (MiG killer) + 87-0245 140FW 120FS AF87-0231 115FW 176FS AF86-0243 And for fun throw in 20FW 77FS AF91-0353 (MiG killer) which is also in HG5 it would be a blast 🀩
  5. 140FW 120FS, 177FW 119FS, 149FW 182FS, 115FW 176FS all have 1 or more in HG5 scheme. Looking really good in my opinion
  6. Don't know. The point of the pallet is to increase the number to be carried, so don't see the logic of carrying it straight on the pylon
  7. As per various articles from September 2019, the A-10C is set to receive it in the future. Given the time from these articles until today I doubt they'd have time to implement and make it operational. The same articles state the A-10C should be able to carry up to 18. With normally 4 per pallet, the number doesn't add up so likely some inaccuracies πŸ˜‰
  8. Funny, Kits-World have done exactly the same mistake with the serial on Sweet Arlene, although I can understand why.
  9. VF-2 flew the F-14D until retirement - did the loadouts you provide apply for them too?
  10. Thanks GW8345, excellent information🀩
  11. Checked some of the reference photos I've downloaded from the net, and seems that atleast later in service life it was possible to load 2x GBU-38 or GBU-12's on front pallets? Do you have more details on this please?
  12. Thank you very much, this is most helpful for upcoming project πŸ˜ŽπŸ‘
  13. So do I understand you correctly they had to have the GBU-16 on one side and GBU-12 on the other? Ie right side only 16's and 12's on left side? Or was the solution right forward GBU-16, left forward GBU-12, right rear GBU-12, left rear GBU-16?
  14. AIM-9B. Only US Navy flew with the AIM-9D in US service.
  15. Have you tried www.F-16.net? Lots and lots of reference photos from all air forces including Israel. http://www.f-16.net/g3/f-16-photos/album07/album08/998_001 https://www.alamy.com/stock-photo-an-f-16b-netz-of-the-israeli-air-force-gets-the-take-off-clearance-56656557.html
  16. Kursad, Would it be an idea to combine the RF-8 with some F-8E/J's from VFP-63? Few decals out there for the gun nosed version flying with VFP-63?
  17. You just made my day - thank you very much πŸ€©πŸ˜πŸ‘
  18. GE/MCID inlet started with F-16C 86-0262 and F-16D 86-0044. All GE Vipers following these serial have the "big mouth". So easy to see from the serial alone.
  19. As with any conversion, you'll need to add a thin plasticard plate to fill inn the broader footprint of the C-tail. Then, when this is done and depending on your AMS, you'll need to do some re-scribing. Then you can add just about any A/B tail you prefer. That said, there is good aftermarked items from PWMP that is better suited than the Italeri tail. But this all comes down to your preference and wallet, and in the end it is your model. To put in a different way; I just bought the Italeri kit for the blisters only, to transfer these to a better tail in order to eventually make an ADF. So crazy is what crazy does πŸ˜‚
  20. You could try this one and adapt it? https://www.hannants.co.uk/product/VTHM117?result-token=ZddG2
  21. Great news! Will the stensil sheet be available separately too?
  • Create New...