Jump to content

General Grievous

Members
  • Content Count

    285
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by General Grievous

  1. I only know of Testors 1/72 and Revell 1/144. Edit: There's also a Dragon 1/200. Take a look at ARC's gallery! GG
  2. I'm seriously thinking in sanding the canopy flat and just painting the frame on the outside. GG
  3. Yep... you're right. I've been seeing some pics. Besides the seats, just adding some styrene to the internal canopy frame will give a 3D look to the cockpit. Perhaps throwing some tiny manuals over the dash too ;-) GG
  4. I think I'm going to scratchbuild a fake cockpit interior. Just so it doesn't look so empty from the outside. GG
  5. These scratchbuilt Star Destroyers are also a sight to see: http://home.woh.rr.com/hobbypics/images/index.html http://home.woh.rr.com/hobbypics/images/SD2.htm GG
  6. I read that there's a Golden Dragon cockpit detail set for the Testors B-2 1/72. I couldn't find anything about it on Google... Does anyone have any info? Links? Pics? GG
  7. Wow! 1st place... not a bad start at competitions, huh? Congratulations Anthony! GG
  8. Wow... that box brings me memories... that kit is the second jet model I bought in my life! Can't even remember how old I was! I did a terrible F-111B paint job! LOL The landing gear was movable, but too flimsy! GG
  9. Now I recall an old ARC thread where some people said Italeri's A-6 1/72 was sligthly better than the Fujimi one. So the Italeri EA-6A must be also slightly better too... GG
  10. As far as I know Italeri's A-6E 1/72 is different than Fujimi's, so I guess the EA-6A is also different. GG
  11. Is the Fujimi EA-6A kit better than the Italeri one? Thanks, GG
  12. Raymond: http://www.g0v.org/Why_I_am_Happier_in_Europe_Russia.htm
  13. I truly can't understand people preferring talking about venezuelan sukhois than venezuelan Patricia Velasquez. GG
  14. Yeah, let's speak about venezuelan models:
  15. Beautiful shot of this sui generis aircraft. GG
  16. "Survival of the fittest" is nothing new! GG
  17. I'm pretty sure the authors think that surviving many missions flying those WWI craters was just a matter of pure luck. I guess piloting ability, fiber and combat experience have nothing to do with increasing the chances of surviving to fight another day (and perhaps getting another chance to shoot down a less experienced enemy pilot)... GG
  18. Good point but then some of us are questioning what the magazine's article is saying. GG
  19. " In the fields of observation chance favors only the prepared mind - Louis Pasteur " ;) GG
  20. This is a utterly ridiculous conclusion. I could win lottery 80 times in a row by pure chance too, as this is also mathematically possible. These two "scientists" must be really "economists". GG
  21. Yeah, slightly different... but in my opinion they look better on the Rafale. GG
  22. Perhaps a "hey look, we're not Hasegawa" statement! B) GG
  23. Don't hold your breath... B) GG
×
×
  • Create New...