Jump to content

Alvis 3.1

Super Mods
  • Content Count

    210
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Alvis 3.1

  1. See: -Lucas, Prince of Darkness. -Lucas Three Position Switch: Dim/Flicker/Off -Triumph Oil Indicator: That black line on the road trailing behind the car -Lucas= Loose Unsoldered Connections and Splices
  2. Au contraire, mon frère, British cars are the MOST intelligence vehicles ever built. They know before you do when you're done driving for the day.
  3. Phew! I was worried there for the safety of our Keebler Elves cookies supply chains.
  4. Thanks! I recently watched the Clifford movie and found it enjoyable, with only mild degrees of pretentiousness. What are your thoughts on it?
  5. It's self explanatory. Really. Read it again.
  6. 😄 I ordered your IBTL Trophy, but I think I accidentally ordered an IBS one instead. My bad bro.
  7. Exactly. This is why threads get locked.
  8. Any time you whine that you are sure to be blocked, shut down or ignored, you are acting like a martyr. Over and over. Pretty much every post you've done here ends with you claiming nobody will listen to you and the conversation is going nowhere. You act like you are being persecuted. Have you been blocked? Had the thread closed? Nope. But please keep driving nails into your own hands and claiming people are being mean to you. They aren't. Complaining about how the site is run isn't being a martyr. Pretending that complaining is persecuted is being a martyr. You project mo
  9. I used that link on Chrome just now and it's working ok for me.
  10. The reality is that not everybody is a good fit on every site. I'm glad he's contributing to the world of modelling knowledge. He's an awesome source of information!
  11. Nope. Participation and entertaining do not equate lockdowns. BTW, was that your way of posting "IBTL"? :P
  12. Seriously dude, the nail holes in your palms haven't healed over from your last time. Projection, projection, projection. Yeesh. Everything has room for improvement, even your attitude, but since you end pretty much every commentary with a surrender declaration, well maybe you should wave nice to the cameras and give General MacArthur a big ole smooch and call it a day then.
  13. You're the one who made an accusation without evidence, except for hearsay. Sorry, right off the bat that hurts any chance you might have had for "fair and impartial" actions. But hey, at least I am trying. And again, he's stated many times that he's needed extra funds to keep the site up and running. Your bias against Steve seems to have caused some memory problems. I assume you don't build models as a source of income? Or play golf? Or watch TV? Or play D&D? Or whatever you might call a hobby? If you had the slightest clue what A
  14. Oops! my bad. I'll fixify that. Alvis 3.1
  15. You're the one who made an accusation without evidence, except for hearsay. Sorry, right off the bat that hurts any chance you might have had for "fair and impartial" actions. But hey, at least I am trying. And again, he's stated many times that he's needed extra funds to keep the site up and running. Your bias against Steve seems to have caused some memory problems. I assume you don't build models as a source of income? Or play golf? Or watch TV? Or play D&D? Or whatever you might call a hobby? If you had the slightest clue what ARC brings in f
  16. Don't worry, you aren't on the Tally Banned list. Fun fact: Very few people get banned from ARC. Most flounce off on their own. As who who "made" the site, yes, it's the content for the members who "make the site". Steve just paid the bills to host it, and set it up to run. But hey, nice swipe at Steve, knowing he's not around to defend his reputation. I'm sure your "source in the know" has their facts right, uh huh? Noticed you didn't name them. ARC doesn't generate enough money to support itself. it's been that way for decades, likely since day 1. Steve has never made that
  17. Please no speculation or posturing. Any posts not observing this will be removed. Al P ARC Moderation Team
  18. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/canadian-military-helicopter-missing-1.5550395
  19. There was a story posted online that outlined this scenario. I've long lost the link, but the author covered the use of missiles and guided weapons, as they'd be irreplacable in the 40s, and the US gearing up to produce ammo and ordnance that would work with the 1980s aircraft. Crew would get split up from the Nimitz and posted to ships that would incorporate things like radar systems derived from the Nimitz, and engineers and maintainers on jet engines and the like. Even an S-3 would be an incredibly fast aircraft for 1942. If I recall, the Nimitz struck the IJN force and caused severe damage
×
×
  • Create New...