Skull Leader
-
Content Count
3,646 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Posts posted by Skull Leader
-
-
Nuff said.
need one for a B-17 build. I'd take either the Koster or Pro Modeler Cheyenne tail. Anyone have one they're willing to sell?
-
Nuff said.
need one for a B-17 build. I'd take either the Koster or Pro Modeler Cheyenne tail. Anyone have one they're willing to sell?
-
Mystery solved: he worked on a B-17H!
-
On 7/15/2023 at 1:46 PM, Buckmeister said:
I think all of the PB-1Gs that had the radome in the nose like that were Coast Guard birds. The Navy’s B-17s were PB-1Ws with the big radome in the belly, used for early AEW platforms.
Hmmm. What is the likelihood of a Navy wrench-monkey working on someone else's bird while stationed on saipan? Would the coast guard have kept rescue birds out there? What about the USAAC?
-
Thanks, Joe.
Don't suppose you have an image somewhere that shows what the rest of the markings on a NMF Navy B-17G would look like?
-
So my (long departed) grandfather in law was in the navy in WWII and evidently worked on a B-17.
The photo in my grandmother in laws album shows what is clearly a B-17G with the nose scanner radar instead of the chin turret... but has all other guns and turrets installed (at least the dorsal one, and it has cheek guns). The aircraft is NMF and not blue (which I thought was weird).
So... is this a navy SB-17G? Some other bastardized configuration? My father in law wants a model of the aircraft, but I can't extrapolate a lot from this photo. Anyone able to help? It's a pacific theater aircraft if that helps. Thanks guys!
-
15 hours ago, GW8345 said:
I've never heard that and I did two cruises with LANTRIN equipped Bravo's (VF-143 98 and 00 cruise). In 98 our birds has the fishbowl TID's (they're a great place to set your cranial while you are FOD checking the back seat) and we flew LANTRIN on every bird. I don't recall getting PTID's from other squadrons before work-ups and then having to give them up after the cruise either and I was in QA (we had to FOD check the cockpit just about anytime someone touched the plane).
Well, that answers that!
-
I was duly impressed. Of course liberties must be taken, for flow if for nothing else, but their attention to detail on the flying scenes is impressive (Mav mentions having up to date ATIS info while taxiing in the Darkstar, training loadouts carried during the training mission, traded for live loadouts during the real mission, the whole Tomcat startup process (obviously not the entire dance, but enough to point out that Paramount knew the Tomcat was as much a star of the show as Tom Cruise... to the point of even mentioning pulled fuses in the RIO seat).
I was especially impressed with the Tomcat stuff, especially for knowing that a real tomcat was used for the ground stuff, but it is not readily apparent when they make the transfer to the CGI stuff. Did Heatblur have a hand in helping with the flying parts of the tomcat?
I'm one behind Darren. I've seen it four times, but I'm likely to hit it at least one more time before it leaves theaters.
-
Not to re-open a really old can of worms that we've debated in years long past....
but I thought the PTID displays were brought online with the first LANTIRN F-14Bs? I was under the impression that the older fishbowl TID display used in the F-14As and Bs in theory *could* use the LANTIRN, but the resolution was pretty terrible to the point of being unuseable? I know the D models had a higher-resolution TID display that could handle the LANTIRN footage more easily. I seem to recall hearing that in the early LANTIRN years of the mid 1990s, PTIDs were transferred between squadrons whenever LANTIRNs were shifted, and that TARPS equipped jets (at least early on) typically never got PTID displays?
-
Thanks for the info, guys! I think I can safely pass on adding the wire to my jet and save the skills-flex for a future project lol
-
After conversing with st0rm on the matter and unable to find definitive answers, I turn to the masses....
I'm building an Arkansas KC-135A (of which, at best, ive found maybe 5 reference photos of the 189th during their ARW days) and upon doing more research of A models, it seems some had the aerial wire that ran from the tail to the front of the fuselage and some did not.
I can't find any rhyme or reason for this... I know that thanks to modelers license, I can build it however I want but I'm left curious about it.
It doesn't seem time-dependent.... later shamu-colored A models didn't have them (the ones I've seen anyhow) while some of the older silver or ADC gray ones did.... conversely, every modern 135R I can see on the ramp at McConnell has the wire.
I'm probably gonna wind up adding the aerial wire, but was just curious if anyone could clue me in?
-
On 1/16/2022 at 1:20 AM, ElectroSoldier said:
There were grey aircraft in South East Asia?
Maybe he means he photographed them stateside
-
Looks like radome tan to me.
-
My name is bumpity.... pronounced with an umpity....
-
2 hours ago, ESzczesniak said:
That's an interesting note. Any one have any ideas where I could find BuNo's? Seems I should be able to use F-4N markings from the 'Dem Bones sheets, but maybe change the BuNo.
I have a list, but heaven only knows where I put it. Just look at photos from the time, it'll be obvious which ones are bravos and which ones are novembers. There's a pretty popular picture of 4 jolly Roger's phantoms flying in a diamond formation from late 1973. 3 of the jets in formation are bravos and 1 is a November. Easy enough to get bunos off that list. I dont think the Bs had names stenciled on the canopies
-
18 minutes ago, agelos2005 said:
Any help of what I need to look for?
I mean... are you painting it yourself? Just make sure the decals are the right for the cruise you want to depict.
-
8 minutes ago, agelos2005 said:
That will.be great to keep the kit as is and just add the full black tail
If you're doing a jet from 1965, make sure you get decals specific to that... the skull looked different
-
The tamiya F-4B it should be fine as-is.
If you want to build a jet from the 73 cruise, some them had the RHAW blisters on top of the tail, you should research the specific airframe to figure out which ones.
-
They did not initally have the all black tail for their F-4B cruise. On the way home from Vietnam, they painted the tails all black. These can be identified by the yellow vagabond stripe on the fuselage (as opposed to black), black radome, and the USS Independence markings on the side. VF-84 lost 3 jets on that cruise ('64-'65)
ALSO, according to Don Hanna, who commanded the squadron during their final phantom cruise, when they were switching from F-4Js to F-4Ns, they received a number of F-4Bs as placeholders until enough N models came out of rework, so there were all-black tail F-4Bs for a short while in 1973 also. These will be characterized by their white radome and USS Roosevelt markings.
-
On 8/17/2021 at 4:16 AM, Marvinblue said:
Thanks for the reply Mark. I'll check it out. Do you know if the Hasegawa Weapons Set E is still available? I can't seem to find it anywhere..
They re-pop another run every 10 years or so. Theyre at the nadir of their availability just now. You're better off chasing the meng sets unless you absolutely have to have the hasegawa set... in which case, be prepared to take out a small loan
-
The words "make sense" and Tamiya's marketing strategy seldom belong in the same sentence. Mr Tamiya builds what Mr. Tamiya wants most of the time.
Here's the thing... there are a million 1/48 F-4 kits on the market (or at least, easy to find). None of them are outright terrible... the minimal-detailed esci/italeri kit, which still nails the shape of the C/D very well... the testors F-4S misses a few details, but again, very accurately captures the shape. Those are generally hailed as the worst two in the scale.
Some of these kits require a little more elbow grease, but I wouldn't term *any* of them as difficult builds, and all can turn out a nicely detailed and accurate build with minimal effort....
So then, is it gonna be a huge deal if Tamiya doesn't do a long-nose? Someone's probably hard at work on a conversion kit either way.
This isn't a "we don't need another kit of "X" complaint, more of a "is what we've already got *really* that bad?" Everybody thinks that now that Tamiya has a phantom or two under its belt that they're obligated to finish the run... Tamiya can do (or not do) whatever the hell they want.... and they frequently do. Don't get lumped in with the guys holding out hope for a F-16D. It's probably not gonna happen.
-
7 hours ago, Drifterdon said:
My apologies. I should have specified 1/48 scale.
They come standard in the academy bombcat kit, the special F-14B/F-14D boxing of the Revell kit, as well as the Tamiya F-14D, presumably the GWH kit, and I believe there were resin ones in one or two boxings of the hasegawa kit (but just a couple that are long out of print)
For aftermarket, I know the black box bombcat update set had some, and steel Beach did as well... beyond that, im not sure who else has some. The 1/72 hasegawa weapons sets have some, but they are curiously absent from the 1/48 sets.
This list is by no means exhaustive, but its all the sources I can think of off the top of my head
-
55 minutes ago, Tailspin Turtle said:
My guess is that your modeling skills are up to the changes to make one of the F-111B variations depending on what 1/48 kit that you start with. Pete’s conversion wasn’t all that great with respect to the accuracy of some of the parts or the decals for that matter. For most of the information you need, see https://tailspintopics.blogspot.com/2009/10/grumman-f-111b.html. Don’t hesitate to ask if you have questions.
I've got the article bookmarked already 🙂 fantastic resource and much appreciated! I've got the means to draw my own decals, do that's not a huge concern either.
I've got some idea of what I'm in for, I just know the Pete's Hangar kit would be a better starting point than nothing at all!
-
There's a pretty popular photo somewhere of a number of late VF-84 jets (post Desert Storm) in a dive releasing dumb bombs... also a popular series of photos from VF-84 (actually shot by a guy from VF-32 as I recall) showing 3 VF-84 Tomcats flying in formation showing the three major configurations for a tomcat (air to air, air to ground, recon), which also pre-date LANTIRN (though not by much).
Somewhere in my collection, I've got photos of both a VF-51 and VF-111 Tomcat sitting on deck with bomb racks on the LAU-93s. I'll have to see if I can dig those up.
Looking for: 1/48 B-17 Cheyenne tail turret
in Buy and sell - add scale to your title
Posted
Not a clue!