Jump to content
ARC Discussion Forums

MikeC

Members
  • Content Count

    479
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About MikeC

  • Rank
    Too many SIGs for my own good

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://
  • ICQ
    0

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Mighty Eighth and Pathfinder country

Recent Profile Visitors

7,157 profile views
  1. Someone told me once that helicopters fly because they're so ugly the ground repels them.
  2. You'll need a later instrument panel too: that on the D-5 was subtly different.
  3. Nice scheme, and rather local to me: Marshalls Cambridge is about 20 miles from where I live.
  4. I rather think the D-5-NAs (ie no fin fillet) all went to US users. Serial numbers 44-13253 to 44-14052. Incidentally, just as a check against any photos captioning an RAF Mk IV as a IVa or vice-versa, the RAF serial batches were: Mk IV: KM493-KM743; Mk IVa: KH671-KH870 and KM100-KM492. (Source: The Mustang Story, Ken Delve, Arms & Armour 1999) HTH
  5. Yes, Mustang IV is the P-51D, Mustang IVa is the P-51K. The main visible external difference is that some aircraft had louvred cooling panels in the lower cowling rather than the pattern of holes or blank (parts R7/R8 or R29/R30 in the Tamiya kit); there may well have been differences in equipment fit (eg radio) as well: I need to dig into my bookshelves and refresh my memory. So long as you have a way of adding the louvred cooling panels - aftermarket if any or scratchbuilding - an RAF Mustang is certainly possible from the Tamiya kit. And of course, the Aeroproducts prop for the K is available in the Pacific boxing.
  6. So often the way, isn't it? Thanks, although there is the little matter of acquiring one first. Just to make life more interesting, I'm planning to use the relevant parts from the Pacific boxing (which I've recently finished as a 506th FG VLR aeroplane) to do an RF-51D. Thanks for posting the pics above, they'll be useful reference, especially as the first one is an RF.
  7. Very nicely done, and inspiration for when I come to do mine. Just out of curiosity, how long was it from when you started it until Tamiya announced a specific F-51D boxing?
  8. There's a guaranteed sure-fire way to make a small fortune as a model producer ... ... ... .. start with a large one. I'll get my coat.
  9. Not a challenge at all: they tell you on their website. Check out the product page just below the panel containing the links to Description", "Galleries", etc, where it says "Plastic parts" ... https://www.eduard.com/eduard/p-51d-mustang-1-48-1-4.html https://www.eduard.com/eduard/warhawk-1-32.html?listtype=search&searchparam=p-40n I've always liked Eduard. Their 1/48 P-39 series seemed to me to mark the point at which they became a mainstream kit manufacturer (facts and others' opinions may vary). Since then they have got steadily better, but I do feel they are now tending to be somewhat over-engineered. I built the P-51 alongside the Airfix example, and the Eduard was far more fiddly with tiny parts my aging fingers and eyesight struggled to cope with*. There are also some strange (imo) design decisions: others have mentioned the intake and radiators assembly, and the tailwheel proved for me almost impossible to fit as per the instructions. *One reason I'm now more into 1/32 scale.
  10. Unusual, and very nicely done.
×
×
  • Create New...