foxmulder_ms

Because Tamiya is soooo superior and GWH is soooo backward. GWH cannot do anything.

Any words about the decal options? Only Soviet/Russian examples or other countries, too?

Hell yeah!!

It is indeed essential from my perspective. Without my models, my mental health would have taken a serious hit.

For my taste, it was certainly good enough. I prefer to spent the aftermarket budget on the exhausts.

I suspect the opposite is possible because China (and Asia in general) is bouncing back to normal faster. This economic rebound together with stagnation in other countries will attract more business connections with China. Interesting times.

F-16 is just ok looking. But, I really like F-2 with larger dimensions and that sea blue camouflage a lot. anyhow.. did they release any plastic pictures of the Su-27 yet?

Is the acceleration here is real time?? : https://youtu.be/epgkqPJ_bc0?t=381

errrrrr. lol. It is because as a model it is almost perfect. The mold line etc is absolutely a tiny thing if you can even notice it. All I can say from your comment is that you did not see the model in your hands. I dont have the tamiya f-14 but I have tamiya F-16 and AMK F-14 has nothing short compared to f-16 and details and single piece missiles actually makes it much better. From what I've seen I think tamiya f-16 and f-14 look comparable. If you can take time off from the crazy toxic environment of this topic and actually look at the model in your hands, it is pretty awesome

Mig 1.44 is more beautiful:

Not everyone sells themselves for a $50 worth of plastic. Edit: Also, "Kit purchased by reviewer."

Mig 1.44? 😄

Yeah, you will.. lol. and expected. Give me your address I am going to send you one. 😉

@haneto I was going to ask.. is there any possibility that GWH may change how they approach the exhausts? Is splitting them into four pieces really necessary? Can you talk about this with them? Kinetic Su-33 exhaust is comparable and they are single piece.

oh no! :) line is not even visible from here. ! 😄 When someone highlights the missile and canopy frame "errors" which are the result of packaging or some rare defect during manufacturing process I have right to question the sincerity of that "review". The sample I have has perfect missiles and nothing wrong with the frame or the canopy which are highlighted in his posts like under a magnifying glass. I am sorry but that is looking for anything bad on the kit, it is not trying to review a kit or comparison or whatever. Anyhow... so a "general" bite dust in iraq...

"Problems" you mentioned require a microscope to see. Some of them does not exists at all. You can try to keep the moral high ground by saying "hey look I only draw, it is data", I expected that, lol. However, no one without serious motivation (obsession/vendetta) would have done what you are doing. Some people are smart enough to see between the lines, dude... keep going, maybe you can prevent 5 people buying the kit. that will show them!

BEAUTIFUL!!! Cannot wait.

You have a personal vendetta against AMK. I used give value to your opinion but when it comes to this. zero.

yeah it is soooooooooo fat. whole 1mm! if tamiya is accurate 😄

So what? Electric car was from 19th century. We have Teslas now. AMK is the pioneer when it comes to slide mold, FACT. When hesagawa is selling weapons on the side and including almost no weapons in their kits, AMK started to sell Mig-31 with single piece full load R-33s in their kit. You guys keep bashing. time to time, I will stop by and keep defending 😄 lol.

Haha.. Now, things in this topic make more sense. 😄

😄😄😄

Why? You show yours first.

YEahhhhh. how dare you use your brain! 😄

Of course they will. Any press is good Press 😄 go AMK!!! Please release a Mig 1.44 or Su-47 in 1/48. PLEASE!!!@!@@!!!! I will buy 10 of them. each.