GeneK
-
Content Count
646 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Posts posted by GeneK
-
-
Basically - how does the J model differ from the A and C models ...that is, what needs to be done to model other single seat variants?
Gene K
-
4 hours ago, ya-gabor said:
These are the shemes proposed for the kits ... I am sure a lots of other boxings will come with time including some of the colourful ones. : ) : )
Thanks. I'm looking forward to special schemes.
Gene K
-
2 hours ago, Tailspin Turtle said:
... that suggests that [the slotted stab tips] could have been added, at least initially, after the introduction of the slotted stabilator increased its effectiveness and therefore the likelihood of dragging the tips.
Technically Beyond Me ... I don't know! The first E models that we had at Eglin AFB already had the tips. Could be an aerodynamic design "feature" that just serendipitously also functioned as "skids". Homestead AFB also had initial E's so maybe someone who was there can supply proper info.
Again as a short off-topic aside -- it was easy to anticipate the faster rotation, so no problem once familiar. Takeoff technique was optional -- fly it off at nose wheel liftoff speed, or use full aft stick and ease off when nose starts to rise. Since formation takeoffs were more common back then, the fly off technique was more controlled for both lead and wingman.
Gene K
-
On 12/23/2015 at 12:17 PM, Tailspin Turtle said:
Does anybody know when and why the "skid" strips were added on the bottom of the stabilator tip? And whether it was a widespread modification or just on certain F-4s or services?
I can't answer the question, but know they were on new F-4E's in the 1968 time period. INTERESTING TIDBIT: At that time, the E models were undergoing Operational Test and Evaluation at Eglin AFB, and some former-model *F-4 pilots were initially "surprised" at the effectiveness of the slotted stab in pushing the tail down to raise the nose.
Gene K
* No, not me
-
8 hours ago, Rob de Bie said:
I will have an open electronics bay hatch, and an open hydraulic hatch that shows a bit of the engine.
Rob,
Who makes the resin pieces you are using?
Gene K
-
Outstanding details -- thanks, as usual, Gregg.
Interesting to visually compare the beautiful Hornet to the ugly little whatchamacall it.
Gene K
-
24 minutes ago, Niels said:
Now back on topic....
Although it bothers you (for whatever technical/moral reason), I certainly appreciate your "going off topic" since you always add valuable info to any subject!
Thanks.
Gene K
-
5 hours ago, ExchefAndy said:
If you look below the pilot images you should be able to see 4 links, one of them is to the web shop.
Try this link, Jack.
Gene K
-
Great thread with outstanding comments (facts and opinions) from some real sharing experts.
Gene K
-
Thanks, Rich. Great site that I visit often. He has a really detailed collection of downloadable 3D parts for various airplanes, including the Phantom.
Gene K
-
On 2/13/2023 at 10:17 PM, RichB63 said:
A common mistake of kit designers is to misinterpret plans, in this case not taking into account the effect of anhedral.
Thanks, Rich. What is the source of the diagram?
Gene K
-
6 hours ago, habu2 said:
Collect'em all !!! 😂
I really like your positive attitude.
Gene K
-
1 minute ago, sigtau said:
Calling it thoroughly enjoyable is stretching the truth.
But he did say "close enough".
Gene K
-
Where's the "Like" button? 👍
Gene K
-
On 1/19/2023 at 5:50 PM, Bo105flyer said:
But it looks like the paint scheme is all dark gray. What a shame ... .
Well, I didn't make it to Jasper, but sounds like Vince may be able to get up there for some better photos.
Gene K
-
7 hours ago, hooter said:
They would stop about 200yards from us while doing their last minute checks before turning on to the runway ( After a wave from us ) and then blasting off down the runway . . . happy days.
I think a lot of us can relate to that joy.
Gene K
-
I thought the same, but some of the pictures show a demarcation. Will be interesting to see. I may take a short diversion and pass by there Saturday, so will take a picture if I do.
Gene K
-
14 hours ago, Scott Smith said:
Just found the YouTube video on how to use it.
Thanks, so I'll share it, as well as this one:
Gene K
-
http://www.tinfeathers.com/Museum/Airports/VFW_4850/VFW_4850.htm
I may have to check that one out ... just because ... it's not too far off I-65.👍
Gene K
-
Nice, Finn ... as usual.
Gene K
-
10 hours ago, Mig-21 said:
I've did it with 2 1/35 Dragon kits years ago, that were "missing" parts
Scamming is nothing to be proud of -- makes it harder/more expensive for honest folks to get replacement parts.
Gene K
-
Double post deleted
-
16 hours ago, is it windy yet? said:
Have a look at the instructions from Fundekals F-4 stencils release.
To make that a little easier
, here's a link to a great review that has a link to the outstanding Funderkals site, which has this listing, which leads to this download.
Outstanding Phantom reference, as is the rest of the site.
Gene K
-
SOLD
1. Kinetic Gold K48083 F-104G $40 plus shipping. All sprues except the one containing tanks are in factory plastic bags. Tanks sprues intact as from factory.
2. Kinetic Gold KK48089 F-104G/TF-104 $40 plus shipping. All sprues in factory plastic bags
Both kits for $70 plus shipping.
Paypal preferred.
Gene K
Tamiya 1/48 F-4C/D
in Jet Modeling
Posted · Edited by GeneK
I kind of like these Cam Rahn Bay 1969 markings
:
Ordnance choices could be tailored to In-Country Close Air Support vice Out-of-Country Air To Air ... napalm, Snakeyes, gun pod, rockets, CBUs, 250, 500, 750 1.000 and 2,000 pounders ... and the list goes on.
Would be "nice" to see these markings (including a 557TFS Spook on the intakes) on a Tamiya F-4C !
Check out this outstanding model for some foreign F-4C markings.
Gene K