Jump to content

boom175

Members
  • Content Count

    1,176
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by boom175

  1. 17 hours ago, Dave Williams said:

    I think a disappointment regarding the plates is that a PE set of plates was included in this 2011 boxing of the older kit. 

     

    https://www.scalemates.com/kits/kinetic-k48036-f-16a-block-20-mlu--130553

     

    It’s unclear why the new kit doesn’t have the plates, since the patterns obviously exist.

    Most likely the ones on the older kit were a special run made for Kinetic by Eduard or another P/E manufacture. I would think they weren't included this time was for a cost savings move. I wish that they had included them, but I understand the economics. 

  2. On 7/23/2023 at 8:53 AM, GeneK said:

     

     

    What are the "2 devices"?

     

     

    Thanks, @BillS

     

    Gene K

    What I can remember is the rotating guard that covered the ejection handle between your legs and I think the canopy strut was the other, I remember the phrase more than I remember the actual devices. As once I left tech school I never worked on a F-4 again.  

  3. There were two types of 600gal ext tanks when I was in. There was the modified F-111 type tank which the majority of A-10 squadrons used. Then there were the Sargent Fletcher made 600 gal tank and they were used by a far fewer amount of aircraft. They also tended to stay in the same squadron. That appears to be a Sargent Fletcher tank on that 2nd A10 pic. 

    I don't know anything about the F-15 tank conversion but I have been retired since 2011.

     

  4. Looking for a pair of 48th scale AGM-12 C Bullpup B. I know that Eduard used to make them but they are OOP now and they are available in one of the Hasegawa weapons sets. Also I found a company called MPM Hobbies which makes some. Has anyone used MPM Hobbies before, The online ads just show a 3d illustration and not the kit it self.

    Thanks

  5. IMHO The ZM kit has finer and better detail. The Meng kit has simplified details but better engineering for assembly.  A lot of this boils down to personal preference, People complain about the ZM spine insert ( a valid point that could have been engineered better) and they complain about the exhaust shield on the Meng phantoms ) I cant stand it and that's what prevents me from buying the Meng kit. But I love how Meng does the outer wing panels. So you pick your poison.

  6. Well looking at the video of the sprue layouts and such I think I see where they messed up the fan inlet ( i.e. blades too far forward) It looks like the cowl ring is fine, but the fan just mounts to that cowl ring. Academy appears to have forgotten about the inlet extension ring that's part of the engine. See attached picture.

    TF_34_601010-F-0000H-039.jpg.24f0ac3cf06d5e2d53c6e13ed0842e39.jpg

    Also the shape of the engine "Pod" is fantasy but unless your looking up the tail pipe it doesn't matter

     

  7. Are you talking about that blunt cone shaped object that's in the inside of the tailpipe? If so that's called the exhaust centerbody and its a pale burnt metal color. If you are talking about the actual "Tailpipe" thats called teh exhaust shroud and were usually Euro one dark grey from the factory, as the changed the camo scheme to the lighter greys a lot of time these were left untouched. It kind of depended on the unit. I hate to be cliche about it but check your resources on the particular jet you're doing.

     

  8. On 11/29/2022 at 1:20 PM, southwestforests said:

    Just saw this image and it brought to mind this thread.

    Note mix of large and small brown spots in upper wings and stabilators of the USAF F-15E

    and how clean the Israeli F-35 looks.

     

    https://captain-price-officially.tumblr.com/image/701827291216543744

    Saw that a lot in the desert, just get a small leak of hyd or other oily fluid and sand will stick to it like nobody's buisness and it will turn from light sandy color to a dark red brown. 

×
×
  • Create New...