Jump to content

Paul Boyer

Members
  • Content Count

    1,065
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Paul Boyer

  1. I was under the impression that the Wolfpack kit was a 1/72 scale Italeri kit with new resin parts to correct several deficiencies. Maybe I'm wrong.
  2. The 1/72 scale F-35B was issued in 2018. The CV-22 was issued in 2013. As an aside, Xtradecal has just issued a new 1/72 sheet for F-35C. Som test jets but a few squadron birds. These will have to go on Orange Hobby kits for now.
  3. Orange Hobby makes a pretty decent 1/72 scale F-35C. It features weapons bays, exterior ordnance, folded wings, and even a hangar-deck tug. I want to repaint mine with more colorful markings someday.
  4. Here's Revell/Monogram's 1/72 scale F-104C from the Vietnam war. I used Gunze Mr. Color lacquers and Caracal's decal sheet for "My Darlin' Dorothy," the third model in my collection with my wife's name on it! Built this kit on Monday, painted on Tuesday, decaled on Wednesday, and final assembly today.
  5. Thanks, Dutch! Aware! I may get the kit right away, but I'll wait for more colorful markings to come along to finish it.
  6. Here's a Scorpion that I hope to do someday. It's from the 59th FIS (I think) and could have been a one-off as there are others in this unit with marking that are not this ornate. Note the flag rudder and the tiny black stars in the yellow areas.
  7. Still don't know. Read separate post.
  8. No fine tuning of the timing, just 2023. I wouldn't complain; they announced they were working on it maybe six years ago. I can wait a little longer.
  9. The value of reference photos is that they show what an airplane looked like at an instant in its history - about 1/250th of a second on average. The photo Kursad cites proves what it looked like for that instant. However, the photo is not evidence what the aircraft looked like earlier or later, so a black bottom is certainly possible and not necessarily incorrect on a model.🙂
  10. Here's the now-classic AMT/Ertl/Esci 1/72 scale KC-135A Stratotanker done up with Caracal's decals. I liked the Fairchild scheme that came in the kit, so that's why I went with Caracal's much better rendition of the "Seahawks" logo. Enjoy!
  11. And is toss-bombing Snakeyes a thing?🤔
  12. Nope. That one says "could not be found on this server." It offers three others, 144002, 144006, and 144008 but they are for C-141 and C-5s. 😕
  13. I'm building the 1/72 scale AMT KC-135A tanker and want to use the Caracal set No. CD72020 General Purpose Markings. The instructions state for more detailed diagrams, go to a web page on Caracal's site. I do so, and the page says "work in progress." Was this ever completed? The sheet is a couple of years past issue. Has the info been archived somewhere?
  14. I was on a C-5A with two Chinooks in it.😃
  15. I think I remember seeing CAD drawings of the Kinetic C-17 years ago, and they showed a lot of interior detail. I also recalled that they were concerned on how expensive the kit would be. I don't understand why manufacturers put in loads of interior detail where you'll never see it. Do you know that there is a roll of toilet paper molded onto the wall of the latrine in the AMT/Ertl 1/72 scale KC-135 kits? Why? No way you can see it on the built model; it's between two bulkheads way behind the flight engineer/navigator's station. And you can't even see those crewmen's seats through the small co
  16. Yes! But it became relatively hard to find, and Chevy engine red was more plentiful (at the time) and it's very close to the same color. I still have a couple of bottles of CER. Just used some on this Coastie HO4S-3G 1/72 scale Revell/Italeri:
  17. YAHOO! I need that C-17! I feared that the project was dead and gone. This is great news!🤩
  18. I think MM FS 12197 wasn't "bright" enough, and looked dull especially in fluorescent lighting. I've been using MM Chevy engine red for all my Navy trainers AND Coast Guard models. Someday I may run out of the stuff and hope to find a comparable lacquer.
  19. As I recall, the Hasegawa canopy was even wider than the Academy. In both cases, the canopies are too wide, but they fit the fuselage, which means if you are trying to fix the canopy, you'll also have to fix the front fuselage. So you have to ask yourself, is this really bad enough to go through all the work to make it right? Who is going to know if you don't tell them? I settled on the Academy kit because it has great detail, good fit, and overall good shapes. No kit is perfect. No finished model is perfect (and least none of mine, anyway), but they're good enough for me. Don't let "perfectio
  20. There we go. Thanks, Kursad! If you consider doing this one, please also consider doing the markings of the jet at the time of the encounter. I think I have an art print from Lockheed around here somewhere . . . . 🤔 Oh, and in 1/72 scale, please!
  21. Sorry. I should have 'splained it better: The FS paint numbers for the F-16D MiG-25 killer commemorative scheme.
  22. Somebody please see if you can get the FS numbers for the paint used on the real jet - or maybe make model-paint recommendations.
  23. Hmm. Yeah, it has the refueling probe shown, but the rudder is of a G/J model. The foreshortening in the painting is too extreme, making the tail look too large and nose too small. I don't know which kit it will be or if it is new, but my favorite for the C model in 1/72 scale is the Revell/Monogram.
  24. Can't help you on the decals, but you won't have to "scratch" the stabs, just graft in some styrene sheet and sand smooth to fill in the "dog teeth." That's what I did on mine:
×
×
  • Create New...