Jump to content

Paul Boyer

Members
  • Content Count

    1,070
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Paul Boyer

  1. The HH-3/CH-3 has been neglected for decades. Only the Revell and Aurora kits in 1/72 scale were ever widely available, and they came out in the late '60s - early '70s. Whirlybirds did a 1/72 res HH-3H Pelican (Coast Guard) but it's pretty rare. I've never seen a larger scale HH-3/CH-3. The Navy's SH-3 Seaking is another matter, however, but you can't get there from here.

  2. Here's Revell/Monogram's 1/72 scale F-104C from the Vietnam war. I used Gunze Mr. Color lacquers and Caracal's decal sheet for "My Darlin' Dorothy," the third model in my collection with my wife's name on it! Built this kit on Monday, painted on Tuesday, decaled on Wednesday, and final assembly today.

    DSCN0406.JPG

  3. Here's a Scorpion that I hope to do someday. It's from the 59th FIS (I think) and could have been a one-off as there are others in this unit with marking that are not this ornate. Note the flag rudder and the tiny black stars in the yellow areas. 

    59fis-f-89-goosebay.jpg

  4. The value of reference photos is that they show what an airplane looked like at an instant in its history - about 1/250th of a second on average. The photo Kursad cites proves what it looked like for that instant. However, the photo is not evidence what the aircraft looked like earlier or later, so a black bottom is certainly possible and not necessarily incorrect on a model.🙂

  5. I'm building the 1/72 scale AMT KC-135A tanker and want to use the Caracal set No. CD72020 General Purpose Markings. The instructions state for more detailed diagrams, go to a web page on Caracal's site. I do so, and the page says "work in progress." Was this ever completed? The sheet is a couple of years past issue. Has the info been archived somewhere?

  6. I think I remember seeing CAD drawings of the Kinetic C-17 years ago, and they showed a lot of interior detail. I also recalled that they were concerned on how expensive the kit would be. I don't understand why manufacturers put in loads of interior detail where you'll never see it. Do you know that there is a roll of toilet paper molded onto the wall of the latrine in the AMT/Ertl 1/72 scale KC-135 kits? Why? No way you can see it on the built model; it's between two bulkheads way behind the flight engineer/navigator's station. And you can't even see those crewmen's seats through the small cockpit windows. Why not cut costs and leave these items for the aftermarket who sell to modelers who enjoy adding deep details?

  7. As I recall, the Hasegawa canopy was even wider than the Academy. In both cases, the canopies are too wide, but they fit the fuselage, which means if you are trying to fix the canopy, you'll also have to fix the front fuselage. So you have to ask yourself, is this really bad enough to go through all the work to make it right? Who is going to know if you don't tell them? I settled on the Academy kit because it has great detail, good fit, and overall good shapes. No kit is perfect. No finished model is perfect (and least none of mine, anyway), but they're good enough for me. Don't let "perfection" become the enemy of accomplishment. Life's too short and there are a lot of models to build!

  8. There we go. Thanks, Kursad! If you consider doing this one, please also consider doing the markings of the jet at the time of the encounter. I think I have an art print from Lockheed around here somewhere  . . . . 🤔 Oh, and in 1/72 scale, please!

×
×
  • Create New...