Jump to content
ARC Discussion Forums
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Content Count

  • Joined

About Anders_Isaksson

  • Rank

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
  • ICQ

Profile Information

  • Gender
  • Location

Recent Profile Visitors

9,329 profile views
  1. Now what is this, AMK is releasing a Tomcat? And the kit will be out in just a few weeks too? Oh joy! (My sincere apologies, just trying to up this thread to reach page 200...)
  2. From where should one order separate sprues, directly from AMK or from somewhere else?
  3. Good thing that AMK seem to include an optional canopy molded as a single clear part instead of only that strange multi-part affair. And now I really start to wonder if the wings with extended slats/flaps will fit the Tamiya kit... guess there's only one way to find out.
  4. Hmm, I’m a bit confused. is this Italeri/Fujimi release still good for a standard low-viz US Navy machine?
  5. Thanks for pointing out the bulge, I see it now. But as you say, some reworking may be in order to reduce its shape. The spine... any error there still eludes me. It’s possible that the upper section behind the cockpit is a bit too ’pinched’, but I’d wait for a built-up example (where the forward fuselage and GPS dome insert has been added) to better see the overall shape. But still, think I will wait for an F-14A to show up before jumping in.
  6. Hmm... I may miss something obvious but the kit spine still looks OK to me. But those bulges over the wing pivots look plain weird. πŸ€”
  7. Thanks! πŸ™‚ must say I really like what I see here, apart from the main wheels I think it all looks rather tasty. And in this photo I think the spine is less pronounced, so maybe not an issue?
  8. Oops, my bad. I read his post but somehow missed that detail. Thanks! πŸ™‚
  9. I see the mounting points for the fuel tank pylon seem to be positioned dead center on the intake underside when it really should be sitting slightly outboard of the centerline. It’s a minor point, and I believe most 72nd scale Tomcats also has this detail wrong.
  10. Finally got the moxdau page to load so I borrowed a pair of images (source in each photo) of the details previously discussed here.
  11. Oops, I misread your previous post and thought you meant piLots. Sorry! πŸ˜…πŸ˜…πŸ˜… I am very aware of the excellent pitot sets by Master as I use them all the time. 😎
  12. I assume you mean low-viz Sea Kings? Yes, we certainly could use a set of those... πŸ™‚
  • Create New...