Jump to content
ARC Discussion Forums


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Jeffrey

  • Rank
    Glue Required

Contact Methods

  • Website URL

Profile Information

  • Location
    Hong Kong

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. The 1:48 ICM MiG-25 is the prefer kit, but I think it has a few short comings such as the rear landing gear is too weak, and the ending has a cone shape which made the wheels end up with a negative camber as in most builts you saw online (it's a simple fix with Tamiya polyester putty to make it a cylindrical end). I already have the UpWind 1:48 landing gear to replace the kit ones, but will keep an eye on the bronze landing gear made by Aerocraft to see how those two compare. Also, the spine of the ICM kit is too "squared", as covered by others in this forum. Lastly, I think no-one notice it yet, but from my naked eye, the angle of the windscreen canopy is slightly incorrect. For me, it looks "squished". It seems the angle is a bit too shallow, and the windscreen should be given more slope (and angle), so imagine the pilot in the MiG-25 can still have some visibility.
  2. Well, looks like Mr. Liang kept his promise after all....
  3. Looks like people who received the kit got AMK'ed.
  4. Base on the footage, looks like Tom Cruise is flying in the backseat of a F/A-18F, lolz...😎😎
  5. I saw 3 boxes of the 1:48 Revell GR.4 last week when I visited the local store of Sincere Hobby. For some reason, it is currently listed out of stock in their website. Maybe you can email them to order one.
  6. Hey, just try not to be off topic, but how's accurate is the 1:72 Hasegawa Eurofighter compared to the one from Revell? To me, the canopy of the Hasegawa Eurofighter looks a bit too large.
  7. Hi all, From Air Forces Monthly magazine (June issue), there is a small section which talks about the MiG-31 squadron in Yelizovo air base, Kamchatka peninsula. It mentioned the MiG-31 there carries the R-40TD1 missiles, and the badge looks quiet interesting. I just wonder if there is any decal manufacturer who will consider this squadron for their release. Here are some photos from the magazine: From Google, I also found gallery of the above squadron (but without the badge): https://eng.mil.ru/en/multimedia/photo/gallery.htm?id=34802@cmsPhotoGallery https://eng.mil.ru/en/multimedia/photo/gallery.htm?id=37700@cmsPhotoGallery
  8. May I ask the moderator to close this thread? I created it by accident and can't find the button to delete this thread. Thank you.
  9. I Just got my 1:48 exhaust for the Hasegawa f-16... They look really good. Unfortunately, on the bottom of the nozzle (closed), there are some surface imperfections. Maybe it happens only to the one I received. Understandably, it is pushing the limits of 3D printing. Overall, I am still satisfied with the product given you have two options (the open nozzle has no problem). I still want to use the close nozzle, so the surface imperfections will face down, if I can't fix it with mr. surfacer:
  10. I think we really need a set of landing gears for the ICM 1:48 mig-25. The current one is too weak, makes the model sit too high, and it has a conical shape at the end that makes it hard to attach the wheels without rework.
  11. Does anyone know if there will be aftermarket landing gears for the ICM 1:48 Mig-25 rbt? From the built up photos that I found in the web, the "stance" of the aircraft was not really right, looks like the aircraft sits a bit too tall and floating on three wheels. (not sure how to describe it). I think the aircraft should be more lower to the ground and at a very shallow upward angle (from tail to nose). Of course I understand this can depend on how much fuel it carries.
  12. While I may not able to touch or see the aircraft up close, I did feel the noise and exhaust heat from the Su-27 and Mig-29 on a few occassions. Here are some photos taken by me in the Zhuhai Air Show 2016: I will visit the Zhuhai Air Show in 2018.
  13. Since someone asked me to share more photos of the kit, I have created the following link: https://drive.google.com/open?id=17Nw-7NCozwMpC7PwnIL7DHJFSzlVW0qn Just take time to view or download the batch of photos.
  14. It is true that taking actual pictures of the kit, giving out useful links, facts and objective opinion were called dumb in this forum. The following were what I posted since I received the kit: And things start to deteriorate and words like dictatorship, one single person tells everyone what they should think of, etc. were used. In my last post: "But anyway enjoy it, a new Kit is a result of many people effort. " It is as if the kit is giving out for free and I have easy money to throw at it and criticize it at every opportunity. A few people suggest stop the talking and let's build the kit, that's good for you if you have the time, but let me tell you the majority of the people who has the income to buy such an expensive kit will not have the time to start and complete many of these kits. It is similar to people who buy expensive camera / watch / cars only to admire it but not use it. Most of these kits will sit in the closet never see the light (I admit my stash is already huge and I make an exception to buy this kit) . All we want to see is to have well defined panel lines without screw ups, just like the Hasegawa 1:72 Su-33 / Su-35. Galfa, The kit surface is quiet smooth and it is not like the OEZ kit at all, it is just the photo effect of subject focus using small aperture (high F). From this ordeal, I firmly believe the force of the manufacturers is strong in the ARC forum.
  15. Looks like it is true that ARC is really a sponsor's forum, where one got a problem product and stated the facts, posted the pictures, but really get annoyed by the manufacturers.
  • Create New...