Jump to content
ARC Discussion Forums

murad

Members
  • Content count

    410
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About murad

  • Rank
    matchboxoholic
  • Birthday August 7

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    www.facebook.com/NoSideSkirts/

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    izmir, TR

Recent Profile Visitors

7,517 profile views
  1. Go RD Go. got my popcorn following
  2. New F-16 color schemes

    nah, not glossy enough.
  3. F-14 - Why is it so popular?

    like any other vehicle; the shape of the design is pleasing on the eye to those who like the kitty. folks fortunate enough to hear the sound of it's engines could probably add more to the feeling. from a modelling perspective the vast amount of tailart and the amount of dirt it can accumulate would make it an ideal candidate for an interesting build despite being mostly of gray colors with a couple of adversary camo, also a wide enough array of loadout's possible in a single airframe - what else do you need more?
  4. MiG-29 9-13 Fulcrum C

    i love the camo colors very very much, makes an already amazing build very interesting and unusual. cheers
  5. 1/48 Hobby Boss Su-27 Flanker-B

    what a beast, gorgeous build.
  6. Decanting spray paint

    depends on the base of the product, if it's solvent based i'd say refrain using plastic if able because there is always the possibility of solvent melting the container.
  7. dorsal spine in between the engines look more proud than Zactoman's ref shots, maybe the downward slope of the fuselage in that area is more than it should be thus making things pop up instead of tapering?
  8. hard to believe but if the kill was indeed made with a slammer at a mere range of 0.6nm then sidewinders should be shelved for good, no point in maintaining em since aim9 was supposed to prosecute a target at those ranges, not an aim120 - besides hobs my fas$ (love the forum auto correct )if it can't even hit something more akin to bombtruck that is a fitter, flares or not.
  9. looking at the top shot at moxdao, omitting parts won't mean anything since both canopy pieces looks like are shrunk in width around the side; they'd need adding and blending it all to the fuselage contour, not the other way around. this is a kit released in 2017 with a relevant price tag, right?
  10. holy cow that's amazing work
  11. kh followers might be better off with such a feature given their engineering and design philosophy (if there any) - one could only imagine how creative their drooped nozzle solution would be and/or resemble the real thing in the end.
  12. BDRM-2 interior photos

    have you checked primeportal? brdm2 http://www.primeportal.net/apc/brdm-2.htm it does have an interior walkaround
  13. Stug III ausf. B

    Hello folks this is Tamiya's stug3b built oob. usual tamiya, built was a breeze, working suspension was a real nice touch but of course the vinyl tracks are letting down. anyway the model isn't mine and i was asked not to do any kind of weathering, tho there is still panel fading, drybrushing and pinwashes. enjoy.
  14. expectation-wise eduard's danger zone. hobbyboss part of the build was so bad in terms of fit that i couldn't let myself use any eduard goodie in the kit, they'd be wasted. build wise PST's 1/72 KV-122, build evolved into a philosophical level; plastic from flash or flash from plastic? tho i built an Eastern Express T-38 amph. tank kit recently in 1/35, it's capable of contesting with PST just as easily.
×