Jump to content

Fernando

Members
  • Content Count

    30
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Fernando

  • Rank
    Glue Required
  • Birthday 05/17/1971

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    SJK - Brazil
  1. Guys, does anyone know how can I reach the Knetic owner email or forum address? Or anyone who make decisions there? I wanna to ask Kinetic about one simple request. Let me explain why..... This aircraft is basically used by 2 airforces. Italian and Brazilian. Currenty for Brazilian AF this aircraft is under modernization process and already available in some airfields in Brazil. The basic difference from both are the avionics and mission system. After analisys of the available sprues, the kit contemplates extra parts to perform the A1M version ( the M means modernized). The old version of th
  2. Always has someone in this world that take the bait. Shame!
  3. Interestiing...wing nav lamp is not covered by lens in zvezda...maybe becasuse of f4 only?
  4. 1/46 109?? great. Now I am ready to join this 109 with my 1/35 panzers in a great diorama.... Sounds terrific! :nanner:/> Very interesting point of view in another posts, forums and paste here for your entertainament.. http://www.crmbuyer.com/story/...l-Lessons-80524.html No hope Zvezda do a 109 better than this Eduard ones in terms of accuracy. Now they have a plenty of free of charge information and hope they can take and opportunity to launc better 109.
  5. Cool. Tks.. Could be in still 2014...lol
  6. why 2016? Cannnot be earlier? Some changes in their F4 and copy&paste eduard right things and change wrong things will not take so much....i reeeeeeeally need a G6 without those eduard issues such as the ugly wart in wing roots, biiiiiiiig wings as ta152 and weird nose and 90 degress ldg struts.. Furthermore, i like brassin resin and PEs and hopefully these stuff can be fully interchangeable with zvezda G6...
  7. ahahahahahahahah http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jfGm9loEqTw
  8. Interested in see in details the nose and did not show it ... :deadhorse1:/> I love history. Do you know why? because discussions never ends, such as chicken-egg discussions lol.... http://www.personal.psu.edu/cmn5158/blogs/courtney_norjens_technical_writing/5737-Who-Came-First3.jpg
  9. None. All imported from US
  10. At least I am glad to know that all modellers around the world made Eduard sufficiently upset by providing comments, claims and facts prior its release. It is clear when they announced that had "wild" discussions or "hyperventilators" statements in many forums. At least they assumed some issues and fixed them in a timelly manner (Wing bulge over top wing wheel bay, rivets position and some minor ones). At least eduard cannot spread complaints for the "free of charge consulting", which they were not able to realize during the design. The rest.. who knows.. Only serious reviews will show now
  11. Its Brassin engine TBolt...missed to mention above
  12. If Eduard decides to go forward with those changes prior release, mainly the cowling after spinner curve as pointed out in page 6 of this topic, i hope they double check the engine measurements as well. Changes in fuselage foward section may impact the interface with the engine, which may cause fit issues. It seems trivial, but if engine has to changed, then, more mould changes, which will slip the schedule.. :pray:/>/> :pray:/
×
×
  • Create New...