Tancist Posted February 10, 2009 Share Posted February 10, 2009 Here is my new Special Hobby's Bell XP-77, experimental full wooden fighter from 1944. Very tiny kit, about 3 inches long, it's difficult photograph it correctly Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Alvis 3.1 Posted February 10, 2009 Share Posted February 10, 2009 I'd say you nailed the depth of field well in those pics. I've always liked the XP-77, but I also wondered who Bell thought they'd be seeing action against? It looks more suited to the Cleveland Air Races than a combat aircraft. I'm sure it would have been hard to hit, being that small however. Alvis 3.1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Tancist Posted February 10, 2009 Author Share Posted February 10, 2009 I'd say you nailed the depth of field well in those pics. Sorry, maybe I don't understand you correctly, it's bad? ) Quote Link to post Share on other sites
mycole Posted February 10, 2009 Share Posted February 10, 2009 Sorry, maybe I don't understand you correctly, it's bad? ) Quite the opposite, really, he's saying that you photographed it very well. The depth of field for the subject turned out nice and you wouldn't know from the pictures that you had any difficulty photographing the tiny plane. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.