Jump to content

O/T: CSAR-X(who won?)


Recommended Posts

Hey all,

How has life been treating everybody? Anyways, has a winner been named for CSAR-X yet? I know the other companies have protested Boeing winning once or twice, but I have heard nothing since last year as far a winner goes.

The summer is near and the water calls, can't wait to go SCUBA diving!

Fair Wind and Following Seas,

Jake

Edited by X-RAY
Link to post
Share on other sites

Jake,

The program's been canceled. They're reevaluating the requirements and making it a joint services airframe (the first good idea that's come along in a while). There is some priority on it, but I don't see a fly-off happening anytime soon.

How ya been buddy?

Jon

Link to post
Share on other sites
Jake,

The program's been canceled. They're reevaluating the requirements and making it a joint services airframe (the first good idea that's come along in a while). There is some priority on it, but I don't see a fly-off happening anytime soon.

How ya been buddy?

Jon

Dead, and if SecDef has his way, the VH-71 will be joining it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm pretty sure thje President and SECDEF have already had their way with the -71. That program is headed for a complete restructuring.

Thank the "requirements creeps" for f***ing up another set of programs into oblivion.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Jon/strikeeagle801,

I've been good, in fact, I just got done working at a horse show today. I am worn out, believe you me! The reason I haven't been on in a long while is becuase I have been working to keep my grades up in school. Hope to get on at least once a week now.

Anyways, thanks for letting me know they dumped the program. I hope they find something that will work out. I was really wanting the HH-47 to win even though it has no affect on me what-so-ever.

Later,

Jake

Edited by X-RAY
Link to post
Share on other sites
The program's been canceled. They're reevaluating the requirements and making it a joint services airframe (the first good idea that's come along in a while). There is some priority on it, but I don't see a fly-off happening anytime soon.

Any idea on if it will be an existing airframe or a new build? I talked to some Army Chinook guys who were happy as can be when Boeing won that contract because it meant more Chinooks, thus job security and the USAF 53s were so tired and maintenance heavy the Army was having to pick up some slack. I kind of thought the Ch-47 was going to be the best bet on that joint service idea... who knows now right?

Link to post
Share on other sites

It will depend on the requirements, but it is a better than even money bet that it will be a derivative airframe. The key is how much "stuff" each competitor can cram in.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...