Jump to content

C-47's on a Carrier Flight Deck


Recommended Posts

If it were a short trip I would say just a ferry mission. This has been done before. But it would severely impact and maybe even prevent flight ops. Not sure I can be of more help. I wouldn't believe it if I didn't see it for myself. Odd picture. Thanks for posting it. I have seen some pics of P-47 being ferried over to Europe in WWII as well as the well known shot of the Cobra's on the Vinson or the TR in the last few years going into combat. I forget which ship it was and when it was and where they were going but I can distinctively remember four of them on the bow of the carrier. HTH?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I sincerely doubt they were flown off the deck. One off the types evaluated by Jimmy Doolittle for the Tokyo raid was the B-23 Dragon, which had the same basic wing as the C-47. One of the reasons it was rejected was because the wings wouldn't clear the island during launch. I'm not a ship guy, but I don't think the Essex class was that much bigger than the Hornet.

SN

Link to post
Share on other sites
... which had the same basic wing as the C-47. One of the reasons it was rejected was because the wings wouldn't clear the island during launch.

SN

On the contrary, in Operation Highjump 6 R4D-7's launched off the Essex class carrier Philippine Sea (CV-47) they used rato to get off but they fit on the deck.

Link to post
Share on other sites
On the contrary, in Operation Highjump 6 R4D-7's launched off the Essex class carrier Philippine Sea (CV-47) they used rato to get off but they fit on the deck.

Interesting..I'd never heard that one. I know they recovered and launched a C-130 from a carrier (Forrestal?) They basically proved it was possible, but not practical.

SN

Link to post
Share on other sites
Interesting..I'd never heard that one. I know they recovered and launched a C-130 from a carrier (Forrestal?) They basically proved it was possible, but not practical.

SN

Not practical in the sense in that the carrier had to have a clean deck, and it suspended air ops while aboard. It was in part to prove that a larger aircraft could be used for emergency resupply or be recovered. Until the arrival of suitable COD aircraft, one needed a way to evac wounded in mass, as if a ship was attacked or a major accident occurred one expected high numbers of wounded or worse. We in the midst of the Cold War, anything was possible and had to be planned for.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Not practical in the sense in that the carrier had to have a clean deck, and it suspended air ops while aboard. It was in part to prove that a larger aircraft could be used for emergency resupply or be recovered. Until the arrival of suitable COD aircraft, one needed a way to evac wounded in mass, as if a ship was attacked or a major accident occurred one expected high numbers of wounded or worse. We in the midst of the Cold War, anything was possible and had to be planned for.

Remember that they did launch a Herc off the Forrestall in 59, I think it was 59. It was a bigger ship as well as a bigger plane though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...