dragan_mig31 Posted May 10, 2010 Share Posted May 10, 2010 can anyone tell me which are the best starting kits for a camoflagued RAF cold war phantom?thanks a lot. Dragan Quote Link to post Share on other sites
MQM107 Posted May 10, 2010 Share Posted May 10, 2010 (edited) can anyone tell me which are the best starting kits for a camoflagued RAF cold war phantom?thanks a lot.Dragan I'm not 100% sure but I think Fujimi is the only one that makes/made British Phantoms in this scale. Mike Edited May 10, 2010 by MQM107 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
antony robertson Posted May 10, 2010 Share Posted May 10, 2010 Definitely go for the Fujimi kit Antony Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Wild Weasel V Posted May 10, 2010 Share Posted May 10, 2010 For 1/72, Fujimi make the only decent Spey Phantoms. The early ones without the rectangular fin top RWR are labelled as F-4K and F-4M, the later ones with the RWR are FG1 (Royal Navy) and FGR2 (RAF). The RWR appeared in the mid-70s and mainly featured on the Air Defence squadrons, so if you want to do a mud mover go for the F-4M version. AirDoc and Model Alliance have released markings for RAF Germany and Modeldecal did just about every RAF squadron that flew the Phantom. Avoid the Matchbox, Frog and (1/72) Hasegawa kits. On the other hand, the 1/48 Hasegawas are probably the best British Phantoms available. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Andre Posted May 10, 2010 Share Posted May 10, 2010 Like the others said - Fujimi, Fujimi, Fujimi. If you can only find the FGR.2 boxing with the RWR, as these seem to be more common in Europe: spare Hasegawa fin tops, of which any of their new tool Phantom kits contain a few, can be adapted without much effort. HTH, Andre Quote Link to post Share on other sites
spike7451 Posted May 10, 2010 Share Posted May 10, 2010 For 1/72, Fujimi make the only decent Spey Phantoms. The early ones without the rectangular fin top RWR are labelled as F-4K and F-4M, the later ones with the RWR are FG1 (Royal Navy) and FGR2 (RAF). The RWR appeared in the mid-70s and mainly featured on the Air Defence squadrons, so if you want to do a mud mover go for the F-4M version. AirDoc and Model Alliance have released markings for RAF Germany and Modeldecal did just about every RAF squadron that flew the Phantom. Avoid the Matchbox, Frog and (1/72) Hasegawa kits. On the other hand, the 1/48 Hasegawas are probably the best British Phantoms available. Revell's FGR kits in 1/48 are reboxed Hasagewa kits & considerably cheaper but exactly the same! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Jennings Posted May 10, 2010 Share Posted May 10, 2010 The early ones without the rectangular fin top RWR are labelled as F-4K and F-4M, the later ones with the RWR are FG1 (Royal Navy) and FGR2 (RAF). The RWR appeared in the mid-70s and mainly featured on the Air Defence squadrons, so if you want to do a mud mover go for the F-4M version. AirDoc and Model Alliance have released markings for RAF Germany and Modeldecal did just about every RAF squadron that flew the Phantom. Not quite. The F-4K & F-4M designations were never used by the RAF or RN. They were US designations only. The Brits always referred to them as FGR.2s (RAF) and FG.1s (RN and some RAF) from the beginning. The RWR fairing was fitted to all British Phantoms by the late 1970s, regardless of role. J Quote Link to post Share on other sites
MQM107 Posted May 10, 2010 Share Posted May 10, 2010 Revell's FGR kits in 1/48 are reboxed Hasagewa kits & considerably cheaper but exactly the same! And I may have been asleep at the wheel but did Hasegawa really make British Phantoms in 1/72? Mike Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Jennings Posted May 10, 2010 Share Posted May 10, 2010 And I may have been asleep at the wheel but did Hasegawa really make British Phantoms in 1/72? Yes. And so did Matchbox, both LONG before Fujimi's. Both are pretty rough. Hasegawa's also came (IIRC) from Frog, and dates to the early 1970s. Matchbox's dates from around 1976. J Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Andre Posted May 10, 2010 Share Posted May 10, 2010 Not quite. The F-4K & F-4M designations were never used by the RAF or RN. I think Wild Weasel may be referring not to the real thing, but rather to the Fujimi kits - those without the RWR fairing are called "F-4K" and "F-4M" on the box tops, those with the fairing are labeled "FG.1" and "FGR.2". Cheers, Andre Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Jennings Posted May 10, 2010 Share Posted May 10, 2010 I think Wild Weasel may be referring not to the real thing, but rather to the Fujimi kits - those without the RWR fairing are called "F-4K" and "F-4M" on the box tops, those with the fairing are labeled "FG.1" and "FGR.2". Cheers, Andre Ah so desuka... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Wild Weasel V Posted May 10, 2010 Share Posted May 10, 2010 I think Wild Weasel may be referring not to the real thing, but rather to the Fujimi kits - those without the RWR fairing are called "F-4K" and "F-4M" on the box tops, those with the fairing are labeled "FG.1" and "FGR.2". Cheers, Andre Andre's right. I did mean that it was the boxings that are labelled F-4K/M or FG1/FGR2. It was probably Fujimi's way of identifying between the original and the later service configurations. Note that Fujimi revised the moulds slightly to add the auxiliary intake doors under the fuselage and make some improvements to other areas like the Spey exhausts. There's a list somewhere that identifies the various boxings and tweaks. If I find it I'll post it here (or someone else might ) The RWR came in about 1975-6 right about the time the Jaguar began to complete the take-over of the ground support role. I've seen a couple of pics of II(AC) and maybe 41 Sqn FGR2s with RWR but the rest (6, 14, 17, 31 and 54) had already either converted or were about to disband the Phantom element, so would be unlikely to have it fitted. It took a long time to complete installation as there were still a few aircraft without it in the 1980s. As always, try to get a picture of the aircraft you want to do to be sure. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
dragan_mig31 Posted May 11, 2010 Author Share Posted May 11, 2010 thanks a lot guys. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.