Jump to content

Revell PV-1 Ventura


Recommended Posts

Kudos also to David for re-habilitating the AMT Tigercat propellers into something useful. Reduce, Reuse, Recycle.

David

The errors in the Tigercat kit's prop are very minute, at the base of each blade, and easily fixed. Resin props with separate blades are almost garanteed to turn the model into a misaligned-looking approximation unless the hub and blade alignment are superbly tight. Even plastic separate blade props are usually very easy to pick out on contest tables, especially the three blade props... In addition to this, resin blades, especially very long ones, run the risk of bending over time, no matter how they are stored or displayed...

Take my advice: If you want your Tigercat kit to look good over time, use the kit's props...

No such problems on resin cowls of course: Superb work on these cowlings Otto, exactly what the kit needed.

Robertson

Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually the best way to fix the F7F props is to cut the blades off and turn them 180*. I made myself a prop blade jig to install loose prop blades.

Yes, as you imply, the pitch of both the AMT's Tigercat's props turn to the correct side: But no, you are wrong that the same correct blade airfoil can be replicated by flipping them over: The kit's props are a pretty high quality rendering, fairly thin on top of that, with a correct airfoil shape at the base of each blade. Simply flipping them over will not yield a correct appearance because the kit blades have a correct "hollow" airfoil appearance on the back side, and a correct bulging appearance in front. You could in theory rework the airfoil, but the thickness is probably not there so it is likely not even possible...

In addition, cutting off the blades is a major invitation to introduce a slew of inconsistencies in individual blade length, position, pitch angle and fore-and aft squareness. I never build individual blade props as they never seem to come out right for me, and everyone else as well, if just about every build I have seen in a contest is any guide...

Even the securely slot pitch-matched Hasegawa Me-109s prop blades are typically all over the place on most builds... The use of a jig does in theory address this problem, but it would have to be very consistent and precise, and not as good or solid in the end as just a one-piece prop in the first place...

Robertson

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, as you imply, the pitch of both the AMT's Tigercat's props turn to the correct side: But no, you are wrong that the same correct blade airfoil can be replicated by flipping them over: The kit's props are a pretty high quality rendering, fairly thin on top of that, with a correct airfoil shape at the base of each blade. Simply flipping them over will not yield a correct appearance because the kit blades have a correct "hollow" airfoil appearance on the back side, and a correct bulging appearance in front. You could in theory rework the airfoil, but the thickness is probably not there so it is likely not even possible...

In addition, cutting off the blades is a major invitation to introduce a slew of inconsistencies in individual blade length, position, pitch angle and fore-and aft squareness. I never build individual blade props as they never seem to come out right for me, and everyone else as well, if just about every build I have seen in a contest is any guide...

Even the securely slot pitch-matched Hasegawa Me-109s prop blades are typically all over the place on most builds... The use of a jig does in theory address this problem, but it would have to be very consistent and precise, and not as good or solid in the end as just a one-piece prop in the first place...

Robertson

The ones on my kit the foils are also flipped on them. It seams that out of the 3 or 4 F7F kits they had there is no consistency.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Otto,

Great work on the cowlings. Any projected release date on them? I'm not gonna be starting on mine until the P-39, pair of P-47s and A-26s are off the workbench, but I'm already planning ahead for the PV-1.

Jon

My guess is in 2-3 weeks. He should have the master Monday or tuesday of next week and he should have the molds finished by next weekend.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hay Guys, I decided that I want to build the gun nose nightfighter out of this kit. Instead of just me doing the build that way, what do you think if i did a resin conversion nose, so anyone can build one?

Ventura007.jpg

Ventura013.jpg

3_11.jpg

72003_a.jpg

72003_b.jpg

48003.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey Otto, 2 suggestions:

1) i think the idea of a Night Fighter is a good one, IF you can find someone who can make some nice photo-etched antenna aerials. Those are really the make-or-break item for a Night Fighter, whether its a PV-1 or a P-38G.

Also, you will need to clearly define, and locate the recesses for the guns. Keeping them all parallel, or angled to converge is critical. For an idea of what im talking about, look at the nose on the AMT A-20G. Oh- you will also need to incorporate extended, flame dampening exhaust stacks, too.

2) It may be too late to do this, but since you have access to a PV-2, would you consider going back and adding dzus fastener detail to the cowlings? it seems to be a standard on 48th scale models and it will lend more visual complexity (i.e. make them more interesting) to the finished model. Most other Obscureco cowlings if not all of them have this incorporated into their design.

david

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey Otto, 2 suggestions:

1) i think the idea of a Night Fighter is a good one, IF you can find someone who can make some nice photo-etched antenna aerials. Those are really the make-or-break item for a Night Fighter, whether its a PV-1 or a P-38G.

Also, you will need to clearly define, and locate the recesses for the guns. Keeping them all parallel, or angled to converge is critical. For an idea of what im talking about, look at the nose on the AMT A-20G. Oh- you will also need to incorporate extended, flame dampening exhaust stacks, too.

2) It may be too late to do this, but since you have access to a PV-2, would you consider going back and adding dzus fastener detail to the cowlings? it seems to be a standard on 48th scale models and it will lend more visual complexity (i.e. make them more interesting) to the finished model. Most other Obscureco cowlings if not all of them have this incorporated into their design.

david

I am not going to mess with photo etch. I will supply resin antennas.

Here you go, all the "dzus" fasteners you can use.

http://www.archertransfers.com/AR88002.html

AR88002.gif

Edited by Otto
Link to post
Share on other sites

I received an email from Obscureco last night. The cowlings will be in the molds this coming up week. I will keep you updated. I am now also working on the complete night fighter nose for it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

When the Minicraft 1/72 kit came out there was (pre-internet) all kinds of hullabaloo about how it was a direct rip-off of the Frog kit. It wasn't. It's a very different kit from the Frog kit. The Revell 1/48 is no more related to the Minicraft 1/72 kit than I am. The only thing they share in common is that both represent the Lockheed PV-1 Ventura.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...

Hey Otto, Any word on the cowls yet?

TIA

Brad

I just sent Chris an email to find out. I should get an answer this evening. He has the F7F prop set for about $6 which are the same prop type just need to be cut down a little. I believe he might also do that. I don't care if I need to take a bit off the tip myself though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

While we're at it; Great Models was carrying the Vector Prop set for $16.80; is this the high price you were speaking of earlier?

Notice they DON'T have them, you have to request them. Compared to $6 from Obscureco, it is a lot. almost three times as much for only a couple extra parts which most people wont notice on the built kit anyway. The props and odd shape cowls are noticeable however.

Edited by Otto
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks

Brad

I just sent Chris an email to find out. I should get an answer this evening. He has the F7F prop set for about $6 which are the same prop type just need to be cut down a little. I believe he might also do that. I don't care if I need to take a bit off the tip myself though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mike West of Lone Star Models is making props, wheels with proper tread, open cowl gills, and a closed bombay insert. mike is well known for the quality of his work. The wheels can be had with or without wheel covers. The props are individual with a separate hub and include a jig for correct positioning. His prices are reasonable. Hal

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...