Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I understand now, Neu,,a small group of people that are in NO danger of being "bumped into" by someone else going digging after deeper info,,,,lol

Jennings is right about objectivity though, in one part,,,,,it is very hard to stay "above it all" with a kit, even more so if you do catch a big clunker of a mistake. There are ways to word it nicely, I suppose.

It would just be very difficult to keep from seeming emotional if the 1/72 Hasegawa Skyhawk was new,,,,,,"although the nose is 2 scale feet too long, it has sturdy landing gear, and enough weapons and drop tanks to fill two aircraft",,,,no matter how that's worded,,,,my eye would jump right to that 2 feet,,and that is a big enough mistake that I wouldn't expect to find a solution all worked out for me in a review,,,,which is also another trend that people are asking for

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...