Rex Posted July 11, 2011 Share Posted July 11, 2011 I understand now, Neu,,a small group of people that are in NO danger of being "bumped into" by someone else going digging after deeper info,,,,lol Jennings is right about objectivity though, in one part,,,,,it is very hard to stay "above it all" with a kit, even more so if you do catch a big clunker of a mistake. There are ways to word it nicely, I suppose. It would just be very difficult to keep from seeming emotional if the 1/72 Hasegawa Skyhawk was new,,,,,,"although the nose is 2 scale feet too long, it has sturdy landing gear, and enough weapons and drop tanks to fill two aircraft",,,,no matter how that's worded,,,,my eye would jump right to that 2 feet,,and that is a big enough mistake that I wouldn't expect to find a solution all worked out for me in a review,,,,which is also another trend that people are asking for Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.