Jump to content

Italeri 1/72 Mig-37 Ferret-E


Recommended Posts

After a half a year struggle, its completed!

Dunno why I took so long, but I can say since this is a raised panel line kit, rescribing and designing the new panel lines maybe took 30% of the construction time. Another 20% should be dedicated to the Splinter camo masking...

Earlier I did mention the Mig-37 having a strange design, but after seeing it completed, the design has grown on me and I think it's quite a sexy bird!

Unfortunately the same can't be said for the underside... :monkeydance:

Pics are taken by a new DSLR,and although I appreciate the higher quality, for some reason the focusing is all over the place. I think I need a dedicated macro lens.

Without further ado, here come the pics!

8429714201_7795fea6e8_c.jpg

8430806226_c230e19d45_c.jpg

For some reason it looks great with the two mickey mouse air brakes. Closed, it a bit unnatural. :lol:/>

8430808822_828d08148f_c.jpg

8430814496_3f28fefd1b_c.jpg

8429726543_4bd28c1f4c_c.jpg

Nothing says it more like the 80's with that funny trapezoidal exhaust.:lol:/>

8430824244_685e3159aa_c.jpg

8430816030_987ab3ef1f_c.jpg

8430824912_2aa4732130_c.jpg

8430850654_b0a87a2ce6_c.jpg

8429768259_90374a4525_c.jpg

The gold triangle is supposed to be a laser range finder or something, painted it to resemble the F-35's EOTS.

Link to post
Share on other sites

8429770447_814ab35ca8_c.jpg

8429774629_2f421daae7_c.jpg

Tons of stencils and good looking decals, but Italeri's decals are really translucent to the point of tranparency.


8429772433_3c7060e1c6_c.jpg

8429776765_329ddedbb9_c.jpg

8429778977_f7375b31fa_c.jpg

8429781031_eef5cdd255_c.jpg

Screwed up a bit in the cockpit with the sparse detail. In hindsight I really should have put in more detail in there, never knew the canopy work would be so clear!

I managed to avoid the canopy residue problems that plagued me for the last two builds by not using Future at all! It seems the root cause of it was the incompatibility between the acrylic future and the lacquer paints. :doh:

8429782893_b387bcc39e_c.jpg

8430869848_dfd7625bd9_c.jpg

8429787873_2b67efb6e2_c.jpg

More screwups abound on the underside... wrong color for the internals (not everything is interior green blue) and the two missiles are fixed in shittily due to me not calculating properly if they can fit inside.

But not really worried about it since they are on the underside of the build. :lol:/>

As always, larger pics and more images can be seen here:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/df0084/

Thank you for looking!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Agree what Niki said.

Best Ferret I've seen so far.

I've build one a few years ago and I must say it's a piece of work and you need to put a lot of effort in it, in order to make it look "real"....

You did an awesome job here! Very nice

cheers

bearmatt

Link to post
Share on other sites

A wonderful blast from the past.. I built this one as a kid! I love the camo, and the fact that you have put a serious effort in to such a joke of a kit :-)

Regarding focus and DSLR. The larger sensor makes the depth of field shorter. A macro lens will not help you in that respect. If you want more depth of field you have to close down the aperture on your lens (which means it should be set to a higher number). Less light will enter the camera, which means you will need more light or longer exposure times, which means that a tripod might be a better investment than a macro lens.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the replies guys, I see it's stirring up a lot of the old memories!

FANTASTIC Ferret.. :salute:/>

Astonishing build. :worship:/>

Thanks holmes, it's kind of an honor getting your approval! :lol:

A wonderful blast from the past.. I built this one as a kid! I love the camo, and the fact that you have put a serious effort in to such a joke of a kit :-)

Regarding focus and DSLR. The larger sensor makes the depth of field shorter. A macro lens will not help you in that respect. If you want more depth of field you have to close down the aperture on your lens (which means it should be set to a higher number). Less light will enter the camera, which means you will need more light or longer exposure times, which means that a tripod might be a better investment than a macro lens.

Thanks for the advice Erik, It's been quite a bit of culture shock since I've graduated up from a normal point and shoot.

I'm working my way around the new camera, and I'll be following your advice on this.

The only thing I miss is that I can't really take close up pics with the big lens in the way... :lol:/>

Edited by mam-07grublo
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...