Jump to content

Iran's new Qaher-313 fighter-bomber


Recommended Posts

On 2/2/2013 at 11:07 AM, Kei Lau said:

The pilot was trying to tell Ahmadinejad that the plane flies by mind control. Ahmadinejad was so amazed that he covered his mouth with the green book. BTW, there is a control stick in the mockup cockpit. The instrument panel just looks more Vietnam era than 21st century.

Q-313-cockpit-460x306.jpg

Does that thing have a cassette and a CD player? Just like my 99 Grand Am.

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 2013-02-02 at 3:26 PM, Aigore said:

Well they might have the stealth concept right..... wasn´t the mossie made out of plywood and darn hard to spot on radar? :D

Oh well, gotta give them points for effort at least :D

 

Since it can't fly I bet it is very stealthy in the air.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You do know of course that the X-24 B lifting body (FDL-8) from NASA was built directly on top of an X-24 A Martin Marietta lifting body fuselage ? There are construction photos of it out there and it is quite fascinating to see how they build a whole new structure on top of most of the existing X-24A structural outer envelope (!).

 

There is a more or less similar example with the much more recent low sonic boom experimental aircraft which was built by Northrup Grumman from a heavily modified F-5 fighter fuselage. The X-29 is yet another example of an F-5 fighter fuselage being recycled into another totally different aircraft (new reverse swept wings, new single engine, new fin, etc).

 

If i was them i think the idea of just testing the water and see how their concept behaves in flight at low speed would not be a bad idea, so building a (possible) mock-up on top of an F-5 fuselage would make sense in that regard, before deciding to commit to designing an all new aircraft this time (minus the potential F-5 hidden underneath).

 

Given that the X-24B was build with exactly that sort of thinking in mind (test for low speed approach behavior mostly, though it did accelerate to up to about Mach 1.6, thanks to a rocket engine), and NASA did so also to save money (recycling another aircraft fuselage as a base to build that one), something i think was one of the Iranians reasons for going that road also. Lockheed did build Have Blue prior to building their F-117, as a proof of concept, and that thing was not exactly stable (one prototype crashed at Groom Lake), so maybe they are just doing what most engineers do when they are trying something quite different and new: test it with smaller steps first, and then if it works and they iron out the bugs, move on to build the actual operational version. Now wether they would have the money to put such a version in service is completely different story.

Edited by Stratospheremodels
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...