Jump to content

Camouflage Wars Part VII


Recommended Posts

Hey Fulcrum have the new uniforms (since the silver ones)made a noticeable improvement in the Army's fighting experience (victories, losses, tactical advantage, etc.)? Has the camouflage tipped the scales in a notable critical situation?

Edited by Exhausted
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey Fulcrum have the new uniforms (since the silver ones)made a noticeable improvement in the Army's fighting experience (victories, losses, tactical advantage, etc.)? Has the camouflage tipped the scales in a notable critical situation?

Not sure if serious or a rhetorical question....but according to many testimonials from veterans, the Army's digital ACU has cost unnecessary lives. That is reason enough to change to something better.

Edited by toadwbg
Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not sure how you how you arrived to your conclusion, but it's a good question that even the Army is going to ask. I'm looking for accounts from soldiers that have used both or field studies. Also, how has the new uniform hurt the Taliban since it made it into the field?

Edited by Exhausted
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey Fulcrum have the new uniforms (since the silver ones)made a noticeable improvement in the Army's fighting experience (victories, losses, tactical advantage, etc.)? Has the camouflage tipped the scales in a notable critical situation?

Of course. The American fighting man must look good while conducting combat operations. For the same reason we move faster and shoot better while wearing Oakleys and Arcteryx knee pads. It's a known fact that Mystery Ranch packs make you invincible, its like getting that shining star on Mario Brothers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not sure how you how you arrived to your conclusion, but it's a good question that even the Army is going to ask. I'm looking for accounts from soldiers that have used both or field studies. Also, how has the new uniform hurt the Taliban since it made it into the field?

No one has done a field study. We could be wearing pink bunny suits out here and I'd wager we'd still see the same results. Camo doesn't matter as much as people think it does.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you route that pink bunny suits idea up the chain for Easter? :rolleyes:/>

Kidding aside, the asymmetric fighting styles between ISAF and the Taliban allies mean that ambush tactics will continue to reduce the benefit of the new camouflage. But the Army is right in seeking new ways to reduce the chance of detection for the coming fights. Maybe the old silver BDUs (forgive me, I'm not a soldier) would do nicely in the rocky regions near the arctic during certain seasons (Iceland, Japan, Norway, etc.)

Edited by Exhausted
Link to post
Share on other sites

And for some truly important news:

http://www.army.mil/article/131411/New_Army_PT_uniforms_result_of_Soldier_feedback/

I love this part, discussing the existing PT uniform:

They also had concerns with other things, particularly modesty issues with the shorts, especially in events like sit-ups. Those concerns were expressed by males as well as females.

The issue was of such concern that Soldiers were purchasing spandex-like under garments to wear beneath the trunks, Mortlock said.

I guess that's another way of saying that your stuff is hanging out when you're doing situps. Amazing that this was never caught before the uniform was fielded. Almost like the folks that designed the shorts never actually wore them for PT before putting them into mass production. Classic...

While the army is at it, they should get rid of that cheesy logo. Just doesn't work.

Edited by 11bee
Link to post
Share on other sites

And for some truly important news:

http://www.army.mil/article/131411/New_Army_PT_uniforms_result_of_Soldier_feedback/

I love this part, discussing the existing PT uniform:

They also had concerns with other things, particularly modesty issues with the shorts, especially in events like sit-ups. Those concerns were expressed by males as well as females.

The issue was of such concern that Soldiers were purchasing spandex-like under garments to wear beneath the trunks, Mortlock said.

I guess that's another way of saying that your stuff is hanging out when you're doing situps. Amazing that this was never caught before the uniform was fielded. Almost like the folks that designed the shorts never actually wore them for PT before putting them into mass production. Classic...

While the army is at it, they should get rid of that cheesy logo. Just doesn't work.

I can say As a Marine I thought everyone wore shorts like that...

us-1_large.jpg

42b6277015ce769b1a2965b2c83c79ad.jpg

4UjVK.jpg

After all these pictures of Marines in short shorts, I offer these as a pallet cleanser

64h6xd.jpg

israeligirlsbeach.jpg

Edited by TaiidanTomcat
Link to post
Share on other sites

First the Army copies the USMC and Canada's uniforms, now they're copying the costumes of Seattle superheroes?

Least they ain't ripping off Iron Tech and infringing on THOSE patents/trademarks yet... tongue.gif

@TT:

"Short shorts: Because our grunts don't have ENOUGH things out there waiting to harm them, we need to add SUNBURN to the mix too."

Edited by Diamondback Six
Link to post
Share on other sites

Leather PT shorts? Man, you jarheads really know how to party.

We call them 'silkies' and they were banned 3 and a half years ago by CMC General Amos. It was one of the first things he did as Commandant and certain Marines found the ban shocking and boring. I just remember everyone scrambling to find them before they left the PX. :whistle:

Link to post
Share on other sites

We call them 'silkies' and they were banned 3 and a half years ago by CMC General Amos. It was one of the first things he did as Commandant and certain Marines found the ban shocking and boring. I just remember everyone scrambling to find them before they left the PX. :whistle:/>

Well back in the Old Corps we wore silkies. :salute:

vlada_ve_silkies_0076.jpg

They had their pluses

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not a whole heck of a lot different from the Woodlands Camo I have hanging in my closet from many moons ago. I guess its true when they say "if you hang onto your clothes long enough...they will eventually come back into style" :lol:/>

:cheers:/>

Just for comparison's sake:

erdl.jpg

ERDL (1960/70s still in use through the 1980s,) lead to

F5454XX320.jpg

Woodland BDU

US-Army-ACU-Scorpion-W2-1024x702.jpg

Scorpion 2. Subtle differences, but closer to old school ERDL in some ways (return to smaller blobs/little black)

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 7 months later...

Making progress...

http://www.armytimes.com/story/military/careers/army/2015/04/03/army-issues-new-camo-deployers/25241363/

Still wondering about the merit of the "one pattern works anywhere" mindset. Whilst a huge improvement compared to the current pattern, looking at the pics of some troops deployed to Eastern Europe, the new OCP seems to be a bit too brownish. Maybe after another 5 billion is spent, the army will figure out that woodland BDU's work best for wooded areas and the DCU's work best for deserts?

Also, I found this statement to be a bit much:

Odierno also said the new camouflage uniforms are "cost neutral."

"The money we're spending on buying these uniforms will be the same as we spend on the new pattern," he said. "The costs are about the same."

Technically, he is correct but what he neglects to mention are the millions (billions?) that have to be spent on replacing all the ACU pattern rucks, ammo pouches, helmet covers, cold weather gear, plate carriers, etc, etc with the new pattern.

BTW, looking at the pics of hot Israeli girls above, I'm a bit curious about the way they strapped a spare magazine to the magazine in their M4's. Seems just a bit "hollywood". It'd be real easy to plug it full of dirt or damage the spare if you have to get prone in a hurry. No biggie, the whole concept of hot chicks with assault rifles still works well for me. Just a random observation....

Edited by 11bee
Link to post
Share on other sites

Back in my day it was so much simplier.

Stateside:

scan0007.jpg

S.E.A.:

scan0005.jpg

You could use the Stateside fatigues there if necessary but not the Jungle Green or cammies in the States.

Link to post
Share on other sites

BTW, looking at the pics of hot Israeli girls above, I'm a bit curious about the way they strapped a spare magazine to the magazine in their M4's. Seems just a bit "hollywood". It'd be real easy to plug it full of dirt or damage the spare if you have to get prone in a hurry. No biggie, the whole concept of hot chicks with assault rifles still works well for me. Just a random observation....

Since they carry their weapons everywhere at all times, and are barred from having them condition 3 in civilian areas, its not a "dual magazine" its a plastic insert part to keep the weapon condition 4 (IE no mag inserted) while simultaneously keeping the magazine handy. Its a safety device insert with a mag attached:

600-mamach+mag+holder+mounted.jpg

buying_ice_cream1.jpg

as for the camo thing Good luck to the army finally getting it right. The Marines are pulling for you. You can do it! Uniforms are highly complex things especially for soldiers, and this is super duper army strong level hard.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...