flanker27 Posted April 7, 2016 Share Posted April 7, 2016 ANG F-15 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
FAR148 Posted April 7, 2016 Share Posted April 7, 2016 Too soon to tell. She just came out of the paint shop. I do hope someone does make some. Too bad the USAF is no longer doing the F-15 demo... Here's a few more of her :wub: http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v61/far148/org%20ang%20eagle%201.jpg http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v61/far148/org%20ang%20eagle%202.jpg http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v61/far148/org%20ang%20eagle%203.jpg Steven L Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Vaildog Posted April 8, 2016 Share Posted April 8, 2016 (edited) Much better that the weirdly out of proportion amateurish eagle normally seen on the Oregon f-15's. The California ANG has much cooler eagle artwork on their tails by a mile. Edited April 8, 2016 by Vaildog Quote Link to post Share on other sites
fulcrum1 Posted April 8, 2016 Share Posted April 8, 2016 Looks like that horrible gold thunder chicken the old firebirds had on their hood. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Vaildog Posted April 8, 2016 Share Posted April 8, 2016 The USAF need to do an exchange program with some of their NATO partners or the French who have some crews that really know how to do the special schemes with a high degree of craftsmanship. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Darren Roberts Posted April 8, 2016 Share Posted April 8, 2016 The USAF need to do an exchange program with some of their NATO partners or the French who have some crews that really know how to do the special schemes with a high degree of craftsmanship. That's two negative comments in a short time span. I personally don't think the NATO schemes are all that great. The Klamath Falls scheme is very nice, especially the eagle head on the forward fuselage. It's all a matter of opinion. You may not like it, but don't say that someone else does it better, because that can't be quantified. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Vaildog Posted April 8, 2016 Share Posted April 8, 2016 Not trying to be negative. I like the new Oregon Scheme. It just seems the USAF is more uptight than almost any other western air force when it comes to creative schemes. I'd love to see the Air Force take a page out of the Navy's playbook and come-up with some cool CAG type schemes for the various squadrons. You have to admit the USAF would never authorize anything like these Quote Link to post Share on other sites
plasticWerks_JL Posted April 8, 2016 Share Posted April 8, 2016 Looks like it's lacking consistency, and I really don't dig when the artwork is patched all over different parts of the a/c over standard paint. The tails look awesome, though. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Waco Posted April 9, 2016 Share Posted April 9, 2016 I've said it before, but I'll say it again: that looks terrible. It's like they picked three or four different themes and ideas and decided, "why not all of them?!!?" The tails look nice. The tramp stamp looking wings on the main airframe and stabs are awful, and look even worse over the standard Eagle camouflage. The Eagle's head is ridiculous, in placement, expression, and relative to the rest of the markings. Leave the cartoon colored jets to the Navy, I say. This is not a trend setter. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Petarvu Posted April 9, 2016 Share Posted April 9, 2016 I've said it before, but I'll say it again: that looks terrible. It's like they picked three or four different themes and ideas and decided, "why not all of them?!!?" The tails look nice. The tramp stamp looking wings on the main airframe and stabs are awful, and look even worse over the standard Eagle camouflage. The Eagle's head is ridiculous, in placement, expression, and relative to the rest of the markings. Leave the cartoon colored jets to the Navy, I say. This is not a trend setter. agree 200% Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Alpagueur Posted April 9, 2016 Share Posted April 9, 2016 awesome livery Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Andre Posted April 9, 2016 Share Posted April 9, 2016 You have to admit the USAF would never authorize anything like these Let alone the Dutch 323 Squadron "Dirty Diana" liveries... ;) Cheers, Andre Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Jinxter13 Posted April 10, 2016 Share Posted April 10, 2016 I'm Ok with the tail as it is, but that Eagle needs to be removed or re-done. I agree with Waco....that painted eagle just kills the whole idea. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
oppenheimerj Posted April 10, 2016 Share Posted April 10, 2016 it looks freaking good all the scheme, it is simple but beautiful, the european schemes are to overdone always. For me the less is more, and the wings on top they are great as the eagle head Jorge Quote Link to post Share on other sites
strikeeagle801 Posted April 10, 2016 Share Posted April 10, 2016 Much better that the weirdly out of proportion amateurish eagle normally seen on the Oregon f-15's. The California ANG has much cooler eagle artwork on their tails by a mile. California does not have an Eagle. It is a Griffin. Aaron Quote Link to post Share on other sites
torchf4 Posted April 11, 2016 Share Posted April 11, 2016 Not trying to be negative. I like the new Oregon Scheme. It just seems the USAF is more uptight than almost any other western air force when it comes to creative schemes. I'd love to see the Air Force take a page out of the Navy's playbook and come-up with some cool CAG type schemes for the various squadrons. You have to admit the USAF would never authorize anything like these If you think the USAF's uptight then try the RSAF (S'pore AF). Never knew that showing special schemes to the public would be a threat to opsec! Granted they've relaxed their sphincters lately and allow pics of their competition schemes onto FB but jeez Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Alpagueur Posted April 11, 2016 Share Posted April 11, 2016 is it a MSIP2 (w/mod eagle scheme)? that livery is AWESOME... please someone make the decals pleaseeeeeee Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Colin K Posted April 12, 2016 Share Posted April 12, 2016 The tramp stamp looking wings on the main airframe and stabs are awful, and look even worse over the standard Eagle camouflage. This is really the only problem I have with the scheme. If they had overpainted the darker grey on the wings and stabs with the lighter shade, then put the wings on, it would have looked a bit better. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.