MattP Posted April 11, 2016 Share Posted April 11, 2016 Did the late model F-14A's have the ECM 'bumps' by the intakes or was it just the B models? Thanks in advance! MattP Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Andre Posted April 11, 2016 Share Posted April 11, 2016 Short answer - yes. See: http://www.britmodeller.com/forums/index.php?/topic/234910566-tomcats-101-article/ Cheers, Andre Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Andrew D. the Jolly Rogers guy Posted April 11, 2016 Share Posted April 11, 2016 Yep, they appeared earlier than many realize. Here's a photo of VF-102 in 1981, and you can see they already have them. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/ec/F-14A_VF-102_on_USS_America_(CV-66)_1981.jpg Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Darren Roberts Posted April 11, 2016 Share Posted April 11, 2016 It depends on which bumps you're talking about. The ones beside the intake were part of the Block 125 upgrade which also included the ECM antenna on the boat tail. Like Andrew said, these appeared in the early 80's. In the late 90's, the A's began to be upgraded again and received the ECM blisters on the leading edge of the wing glove area and on the left front gear door. At that point, they were almost identical to Bravos. The only way you could tell the difference was the engine nozzles the presence of the wing glove vanes. The A's had the vanes and the B's were puttied over. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Neeko Posted April 11, 2016 Share Posted April 11, 2016 It depends on which bumps you're talking about. The ones beside the intake were part of the Block 125 upgrade which also included the ECM antenna on the boat tail. Like Andrew said, these appeared in the early 80's. In the late 90's, the A's began to be upgraded again and received the ECM blisters on the leading edge of the wing glove area and on the left front gear door. At that point, they were almost identical to Bravos. The only way you could tell the difference was the engine nozzles the presence of the wing glove vanes. The A's had the vanes and the B's were puttied over. The second set of new bumps that Darren was referring to was the upgrade to ALR-67 from the older ALR-45 and 50. When the more prominent intake wedge bumps and the blister on the port NLG door appeared, it coincided with the disappearance of the tiny third blade antenna on the turtleback... as well as the one on the NLG door. That was for ALR-50 and was removed when the 67 hit the street. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Darren Roberts Posted April 11, 2016 Share Posted April 11, 2016 The second set of new bumps that Darren was referring to was the upgrade to ALR-67 from the older ALR-45 and 50. When the more prominent intake wedge bumps and the blister on the port NLG door appeared, it coincided with the disappearance of the tiny third blade antenna on the turtleback... as well as the one on the NLG door. That was for ALR-50 and was removed when the 67 hit the street. Thanks! I can never remember the designations of the ECM systems. i had forgotten about the smaller antenna being removed. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
MattP Posted April 12, 2016 Author Share Posted April 12, 2016 Thanks everybody for the information! MattP Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.