Jump to content

Hobbyboss su-34 sprue shot


Recommended Posts

52 minutes ago, Flankerman said:

It also doesn't appear to have the intake and exhaust for the APU in the tail boom.....?????

 

Can anyone confirm ???

 

Ken

 

 

 

Confirmed. I'm thinking of a way to scratch build those parts. Will likely use a PE grille for the intake and scribing to represent the exhaust.

 

Mark

Link to post
Share on other sites

I scratched the APU intake on my 1/72 scale Italeri Su-34.........

 

Photo%20016.JPG

 

Photo%20017.JPG

 

.... and used a silver decal for the exhaust on top.......

 

Photo%20037.JPG

 

It's a bit crude - but it looks OK in 1/72 scale.

 

You could always cheat and just depict the red cover over the intake.

 

Ken

Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting. I found a couple of photos that show operational Su-34s without the APU intakes and exhausts. I'm curious as to why this is the case. Are these early production machines that did not have the APU installed? 

 

http://www.airliners.net/photo/Russia-Air-Force/Sukhoi-Su-34/2674796

 

http://www.airliners.net/photo/Russia-Air-Force/Sukhoi-Su-34/2771914

 

Mark

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know when it started, but all the latest Su-34's have the APU - and the upper wing fences.

 

So you could model the HB kit as an earlier machine without the APU.

 

I don't think I've ever seen an 'aubergine' example without an APU ??

 

Ken

Link to post
Share on other sites
57 minutes ago, Flankerman said:

I don't know when it started, but all the latest Su-34's have the APU - and the upper wing fences.

 

So you could model the HB kit as an earlier machine without the APU.

 

I don't think I've ever seen an 'aubergine' example without an APU ??

 

Ken

 

Well, the HB kit does include the wing fences so I guess we've got some sort of hybrid then. 

 

Mark

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the APU intake would be better depicted as a PE part - a mesh and surround you could bend and attach to the model. 

Even die-cut vinyl would be better than a flat decal. 

 

The APU exahust on the other hand - looks much more flush to the fuselage.

Ken - do you have any better photos or better yet, a "shape" drawing for it? 

Please email me- anthonywan2015@gmail.com 

 

Thanks! :) 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry Anthony - only what I have posted.

 

The only time I got a chance to photograph the rear end of a 'new' Su-34 was at MAKS 2013 - and then it had the red cover over the APU !!!

 

The only other pic I took shows the exhaust vent - which I presume hinges at the front and opens (?).....

 

su-34_apu_exhaust_01.jpg

 

Ken

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well atleast the tailboom is a separate part going by the link above...so i guess a resin corrected APU boom will be along before too long...still would have been better if HB had got it right from the start given the price of the kit..

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

1 hour ago, mungo1974 said:

Well atleast the tailboom is a separate part going by the link above...so i guess a resin corrected APU boom will be along before too long...still would have been better if HB had got it right from the start given the price of the kit..

Add in a a whole new forward fuselage and the price would really be up there! :doh:

 

:cheers:

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, mungo1974 said:

Well atleast the tailboom is a separate part going by the link above...so i guess a resin corrected APU boom will be along before too long...still would have been better if HB had got it right from the start given the price of the kit..

 

There seem to be some production aircraft without the APU installed. Note that they also do not have the wing fences installed and none of them are in the later midnight blue over light blue scheme. 

 

http://www.airliners.net/photo/Russia-Air-Force/Sukhoi-Su-34/2771914

 

http://www.airliners.net/photo/Russia-Air-Force/Sukhoi-Su-34/2631507

 

http://www.airliners.net/photo/Russia-Air-Force/Sukhoi-Su-34/2282460

 

Mark

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, gb_madcat_sl said:

 

There seem to be some production aircraft without the APU installed. Note that they also do not have the wing fences installed and none of them are in the later midnight blue over light blue scheme.

 

Yes there were several early production airframes in the camo scheme that were later upgraded to include the APU and other features.

Note that the upgraded versions have the bort number on the tail where the pre-upgrade didn't.

*The kit decals for red 05 do not include the tail number so are 'accurate' for the pre-upgrade without the APU.

*Edit #2: I looked again and the decal sheet does include small numbers for the tail so red 05 can be built in the upgraded form if you want to scratchbuild the upgrades.

 

https://img-fotki.yandex.ru/get/28256/26380060.2a/0_ad029_88ed12b4_orig.jpg

https://img-fotki.yandex.ru/get/51057/26380060.2a/0_ad024_218608fe_orig.jpg

 

:cheers:

 

Edit: Sauce: http://wizarden.livejournal.com/115539.html

Edited by Zactoman
Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, 757flyer said:

Mark,

 

What is the Hobby Shop in Singapore?  Was there earlier this year and tried to find a shop or two, but never succeeded...

 

Thanks!

 

 

I got mine from Miniature Hobby.

 

Miniature Hobby

8 Burn Road

#14-15, Trivex

Singapore 369977

 

They're on Facebook too.

 

https://www.facebook.com/Miniature-Hobby-International-Pte-Ltd-127442410675064/

 

Mark

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...

I've wanted one of these ever since the 72nd Italeri kit. But I resigned myself to waiting for the Kittuhawk due to the dismal (IMHO) record of TrumpyBoss quality. Their armor is usually very nice, but I think the guys who design the acft. kits have too much local wine at work. Or, maybe some Cambodian Red... 

Is anyone really surprised this kit has rather glaring errors in it? I have to say, I'm not,,,

 

JMO

 

DET1460

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not trying to start a flame war. Although everyone is not too fond of Trumpeter, but given Kitty Hawk's track record I am afraid its just a case of lesser of two evils IMHO (how bizarre this happens all the time these days). 

Edited by Fayfaychu
typo
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...