Jump to content

Recommended Posts

14 hours ago, nspreitler said:

We can replace them with F-35s,  it has a gun with 1/6th the ammunition.  Instead of BRRRRT we will just get BR.  I do know of situations against ISIS where the results would have been very different without those 1174 rounds of 30mm.  

 

True. And It's all about the gun. it's been  that way since world War 2. A-10s do great against serious opposition too. They were in downtown Baghdad day 1 everytime.  unlike those brrrrtless other aircraft

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you need to get in close the gun is by far the best choice.  If you have a lot of targets, like infantry attacking across several kilometers they are great.  

 

I have coordinated CAS for units in contact with less than 100 meters of separation between forces, I have seen what the A-10 can do and there is no way the F-35 with 180 rounds would have had the same effect in that situation. 

 

The A-10 can't do everything, and neither can the F-35. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, marcinko said:

 

 

Says whom ?

 

basically Everyone the USAF for one, here is the official line from Boeing:

 

Boeing has continued to evolve the F-15 with advanced technology, and it is undefeated in air-to-air combat — 101 aerial victories and 0 defeats. Production continues today with advanced models for several international customers.

Edited by TaiidanTomcat
Link to post
Share on other sites

There are a lot of kills contested (from memory at least 2 Fulcrums and even older generations contested) and there`s consensus that at least one F-15A fell pray to a Syrian Foxbat

 

Take with a huge grain of salt what Boeing says, you remember what the military & Bush were saying after Desert storm regarding Patriot ?  Lets just say the GAO report on Patriot performance painted a different picture

Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, TaiidanTomcat said:

 

basically Everyone the USAF for one...

 

Not to mention the pilots that have flown the F-15, but hey what would we know about its record in air combat.

 

Regards,

Murph

Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, marcinko said:

There are a lot of kills contested (from memory at least 2 Fulcrums and even older generations contested) and there`s consensus that at least one F-15A fell pray to a Syrian Foxbat

 

Take with a huge grain of salt what Boeing says, you remember what the military & Bush were saying after Desert storm regarding Patriot ?  Lets just say the GAO report on Patriot performance painted a different picture

 

 

Official is official. it's globally recognized that it's never been shot down in air to air combat, conspiracy theories and irrelevant comparisons aside.

 

Have a good one. we hear you complaining, we aren't changing, but thanks anyway

Edited by TaiidanTomcat
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, 11bee said:

 

That's awesome but irrelevant.  The only track record that matters is how well they will do in the next war.

 

 

 

That's ridiculous. you can lose like 6 of them and have them pulled back, in 1991 and maintain its invincible cred. 

 

Clearly its performance in the future is irrelevant

Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, TaiidanTomcat said:

 

 

Official is official. it's globally recognized that it's never been shot down in air to air combat, conspiracy theories and irrelevant comparisons aside.

 

Have a good one. we hear you complaining, we aren't changing, but thanks anyway

 

TT, that being said, I don't think there are any concerns about the US record but with regard to the Eagle in Israeli service, it's not quite as black and white.   From previous wars, the Israeli's have a demonstrated record of attributing many known A2A losses to enemy SAM's instead.   Maybe it's possible that they have lost an F-15 to another aircraft.  In the end, if the record is 101 to 0 or 101 to 1, does it really matter?  And since the overwhelming majority of all F-15 kills were against 3rd world nations who flew inferior equip, used inferior tactics and were pretty much overwhelmed from the get go, I would suggest that any chest beating over the Eagle's kill record is a bit misplaced anyway.   Would anyone suggest that if the enemy was a peer adversary, we'd still be talking about a 101 to 0 kill ratio?    Keep in mind that the Might Tom also has a perfect A2A record as well (god bless their aluminum souls). 

Edited by 11bee
Link to post
Share on other sites
39 minutes ago, 11bee said:

 

TT, that being said, I don't think there are any concerns about the US record but with regard to the Eagle in Israeli service, it's not quite as black and white.   From previous wars, the Israeli's have a demonstrated record of attributing many known A2A losses to enemy SAM's instead.   Maybe it's possible that they have lost an F-15 to another aircraft.  In the end, if the record is 101 to 0 or 101 to 1, does it really matter?  And since the overwhelming majority of all F-15 kills were against 3rd world nations who flew inferior equip, used inferior tactics and were pretty much overwhelmed from the get go, I would suggest that any chest beating over the Eagle's kill record is a bit misplaced anyway.   Would anyone suggest that if the enemy was a peer adversary, we'd still be talking about a 101 to 0 kill ratio?    Keep in mind that the Might Tom also has a perfect A2A record as well (god bless their aluminum souls). 

 

 

Youre right it only makes the perfect in air to air A-10 even better. it's truly perfect

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...