strikeeagle801 Posted April 29, 2017 Share Posted April 29, 2017 From a KC-46 test flight today. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Alternative 4 Posted May 2, 2017 Share Posted May 2, 2017 Test flights aren't the time to be horsing around. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
11bee Posted May 2, 2017 Share Posted May 2, 2017 7 hours ago, Alternative 4 said: Test flights aren't the time to be horsing around. Get off your high horse! JK. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
GreyGhost Posted May 3, 2017 Share Posted May 3, 2017 The KC-46 is called the Pegasus, right? -Gregg Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ST0RM Posted May 3, 2017 Share Posted May 3, 2017 On 5/2/2017 at 2:33 AM, Alternative 4 said: Test flights aren't the time to be horsing around. Especially when you're nearly 2 years behind contract. Yes it's officially the Pegasus. But the -135 crowd calls them Peggy. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
SBARC Posted May 3, 2017 Share Posted May 3, 2017 9 hours ago, ST0RM said: Especially when you're nearly 2 years behind contract. Yes it's officially the Pegasus. But the -135 crowd calls them Peggy. How does this compare with the KC-135? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
strikeeagle801 Posted May 4, 2017 Author Share Posted May 4, 2017 (edited) On 5/2/2017 at 0:33 AM, Alternative 4 said: Test flights aren't the time to be horsing around. *technically* it was a test-taxi. AFTER a test flight. :-) Edited May 4, 2017 by strikeeagle801 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ST0RM Posted May 9, 2017 Share Posted May 9, 2017 On 5/3/2017 at 5:43 PM, SBARC said: How does this compare with the KC-135? Same fuel capacity, slightly better fuel economy. But not worth all the headaches and delays. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.