Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Let's move on, guys - I guess he has a point (of sorts), while the delivery could have been a bit better.

 

Note that these days I try not to announce future projects that I don't think I can deliver in a couple of months or so. As several of you have stated, there is a ton of things that could derail a research project; especially if it is a historic subject and you can't simply ask someone to take walkaround photos for you... I could have easily designed 10 F-16 sheets in the time it took me to do the B-47 or early B-52 sheets, for example. I intend to do almost all of the decals I promised to do, with the exception of a couple of Russian subjects that I completely lost the desire for; for obvious reasons. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The great thing is that there is always something interesting to do in decals.  Caracal has done some things that no other manufacture does, and that is taking risk on subjects that have been commercially avoided. This is especially so since Micro/Superscale stopped doing anything.  Micro/Superscale had an advantage of doing their own printing so you would see them take some risk every so often.  In today's market where outsourcing printing is a must, few companies would have produced the variety of subjects like the F-89, F-94, etc.  Then to go into 1/144 scale which has before been a no go area for most and make several of those sheets successful.  By the way you know that with the ANG F-86A's that Jennings has abandoned his Arizona F-86 sheet, yet Caracal keeps going with new and some very interesting subjects.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
23 hours ago, Niels said:

Let's be honest, there is a grading for the various scales, and 1/48 is by far the most popular!
Which follows next, 1/32 or 1/72 I cannot say, but I know that there are other manufacturers who expressly avoid 1/72 as there is no economy in it. It simply doesn't sell well enough, while 1/48 excell in sales.
 

 

 

Are you sure about that 1/48 to other scales ratio? I just had a quick check on scalemates.com. I "searched" in the kits-section, simply using an asterisk (*). You can then refine your "search", and the number of hits in various factors is shown: 

 

1/72: 126.707 hits for "kits"

1/35: 86984

1/48: 84335

1/43: 50608

1/24: 39496

none: 34664

1/32: 33599

1/144: 32399

 

Of course this includes decals, aftermarket stuff, etc. But I think it's quite a telling number. 😉 

 

 

HAJO

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 10/1/2025 at 1:26 PM, KursadA said:

with the exception of a couple of Russian subjects that I completely lost the desire for; for obvious reasons. 

 

I have an idea for you - Bears in the US. A sheet of Russian aircraft in US service. I bought 48228 because I kinda wanted to do a MiG-23, but I didn't want to do it in Russian markings (this was before the invasion). Russian OpFor with Hind, MiG-21s, MiG-15s, YAK-23, etc....

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not normally an airliner guy, but here are a few that others might find interesting.  Shot these on Ki Olina HI this morning.

 

314835119__17A5284ANAA380JA383ATurtleKiOlinaHIR5MkII100-500500mmf105000thISO2500CrSM.thumb.jpg.085e40c827d690566faa01205dc7db90.jpg

ANA A380 flying turtle

 

1667257770__17A5037HawaiianAir717-200N488HAKiOlinaHIR5MkII100-500500mmf105000thISO2500CrSM.thumb.jpg.7c6b32c32a045172047ad124ce6ed92a.jpg

Boeing 717-200, when did they start making these?

 

987454062__17A5042JAL787JA880JKiOlinaHIR5MkII100-500500mmf105000thISO2500CrSM.thumb.jpg.ab4349f2581a5c8ef104d7a835ea5031.jpg

JAL making it's own cloud

Link to post
Share on other sites

I second the F-100 in ANG service!  Ohio flew 4 (yes 4!) squadrons of F-100s, from Toledo (green and white checkered tail stripe), Mansfield (yellow with white Ohio script), Columbus (Blue with white Ohio Script) and Springfield (red with white Ohio script). 

 

 

F-100D 0-63133 166 TFS OH ANG 1973.JPG

F-100D 63-109 164 TFS OH ANG.jpg

F-100D 53-797 112TH TFS OH ANG 1.jpg

F-100D 63-456 162 FS OH ANG.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

All four OH ANG squadrons did fly the F-84F's in some some beautiful natural metal jets!  Toledo used black trim rather then green at that time, but the other three units were trimmed in yellow, red or blue.  The Columbus based 166 TFS is pictured here-   The 164th, 162 and 166 TFS also flew F-84E's...... yet another potential sheet!

F-84F 26936 166 TFS OH ANG HI RES.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 10/3/2025 at 8:42 AM, Corey said:

Maryland Guard F-86E with command stripes and nose art!!  If only we could read the nose art!

 

https://piccianiaircraftphotos.com/assets/images/52-2888.263232747_large.JPG

 

 

IMG_9814.jpeg


Ron Picciani the site owner responded to my email, he said the nose art says,

 

No Guts

No

Glory II


Mr Picciani says he’s trying to find a more detailed photo of the nose art!

 

Was Ben Mayo of the P-47D No Guts No Glory fame the CO of the Maryland Guard?

Edited by Corey
Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know if this has been suggested, but a sheet with A/B-26 Invaders and A/B-26K Counter Invaders would be nice to see in 1/72. Heck even in 1/48. Just my two cents. 

 

Dave Fassett 

Link to post
Share on other sites
45 minutes ago, Bulldog 09 said:

I don't know if this has been suggested, but a sheet with A/B-26 Invaders and A/B-26K Counter Invaders would be nice to see in 1/72. Heck even in 1/48. Just my two cents. 

 

Dave Fassett 


I think this is a great idea too!

Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Bulldog 09 said:

I don't know if this has been suggested, but a sheet with A/B-26 Invaders and A/B-26K Counter Invaders would be nice to see in 1/72. Heck even in 1/48. Just my two cents. 

 

Dave Fassett 

A rerelease of 48219 in other words. As it is sold out its a good idea 🙂

Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Niels said:

A rerelease of 48219 in other words. As it is sold out its a good idea 🙂

Yes, Sir. And then release it in 72nd scale too. I have an Italeri B-26K that needs good marking badly. A sheet of A and B-26's from WWII and the Korean war would be a welcome addition too. Again just my two cents.

 

Dave Fassett

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 3 weeks later...
6 hours ago, eraucubsfan said:

Might be a little out there or niche, but this Convair 880 first served with the FAA, then was modified by the US NAVY as a tanker and served at PAX River for many years. 

FAA_Convair_880_N112_63-0651.jpg

conv880_title.jpg

 

 

1563e6020885d63a2e33c731b76e537f.jpg

Convair-880-161572-FSD-Hornet-4-over-Che

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

q76YxndvcccqBjRs6BGVJUTKONt_CYafXROIEPdS

 


👍

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 11/6/2025 at 7:04 AM, eraucubsfan said:

Might be a little out there or niche, but this Convair 880 first served with the FAA, then was modified by the US NAVY as a tanker and served at PAX River for many years. 

FAA_Convair_880_N112_63-0651.jpg

conv880_title.jpg

 

 

1563e6020885d63a2e33c731b76e537f.jpg

Convair-880-161572-FSD-Hornet-4-over-Che

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

q76YxndvcccqBjRs6BGVJUTKONt_CYafXROIEPdS

 


this would be extremely cool!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...