Ranger626 Posted January 28, 2018 Share Posted January 28, 2018 Can anyone tell me if the forward fins (canards?) on the AIM-9E were the same fins as used on the AIM-9B; and located at the same position on the body? I am trying to make a 1/32 AIM-9E by grafting the nose of the -9J (Cutting Edge) onto the body of the -9B (Eduard) . The rear fins (wings?) are the same and I can adjust the length by how much nose I graft on to the body, but I'm unsure if the forward fins of the -9B are the correct size and shape for the -9E and if they are located at the same place on the body. Anyone know of detailed scaled drawings of missiles on line? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
MoFo Posted January 28, 2018 Share Posted January 28, 2018 (edited) Canards are essentially the same on the B and E (the mounting point is a little different, but nothing major). The conversion won't be that straightforward, though. The -9B has different wings, with rectangular rollerons; the E and J have trapezoidal rollerons. But the -9J has a longer body, so you can't just glue on -9B canards. To get the right mix of components and spacing, you basically need to combine a B body and canards with a J seeker and wings. NVM. Turns out Eduard have E/F/J wings on their -9B, so yeah, you can just graft on a pointy seeker and call it a day. Although if you're using the 1/72 missiles, I'd re-work the canards, as they're pretty chunky looking. I'd also suggest carefully measuring the diameter of the CE and Eduard body components - while they're both *supposed* to be a scale 5", there's a good chance they won't be the same. Edited January 28, 2018 by MoFo Brassin Mediocrity Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Ranger626 Posted January 28, 2018 Author Share Posted January 28, 2018 Thank you MoFo, that helps a bunch. I'll give it a shot and see how it works out. Good advice on the body diameter. I calipered the two bodies and they were within .003" of each other. A little sanding after assembly should do the trick. (I had hoped Eduard would follow up with more 1/32 sidewinders, but I got tired of waiting.) Quote Link to post Share on other sites
mrvark Posted January 28, 2018 Share Posted January 28, 2018 (edited) The E was 6.5" longer than the B, all of it in front of the guidance fins. The change to those fins was that they came pre-assembled on the B guidance section, but were detachable on the E. BTW, the Es were introduced in 1969 and were the primary Sidewinder variant used by the USAF during Linebacker (May-Oct 72). The AIM-9Js saw limited introduction beginning in August 1972. They were only used by the USAF, never by the USN/MC. Edited January 28, 2018 by mrvark Added info Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.