Jump to content
ARC Discussion Forums
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
Sign in to follow this  
hueycrew

MH-139

Recommended Posts

It's a helicopter that is in widespread use around the globe. With a bit of luck, we might now get a 1/72 kit of the 139.

 

LD.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

US has been trying to get a AgustaWestland bird  for awhile it seems (VH-71). Didn’t read the specs for what the AF needed but from a DOD bean counting POV a UH-1Y, H-60 family or UH-72 would fit the bill and bring in another supply chain need but hey it’s only money who cares. 

 

A kit wouldn’t be a bad idea, I can hear the current crowd crying for 1/35 scale already.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, Tank said:

crying for 1/35 scale already.

 

 

Amen.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, Tank said:

A kit wouldn’t be a bad idea, I can hear the current crowd crying for 1/35 scale already.

 

A general support helo that will never be deployed in combat (similar to the Army's Lakota) is way down my list of wants.   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, Tank said:

US has been trying to get a AgustaWestland bird  for awhile it seems (VH-71). Didn’t read the specs for what the AF needed but from a DOD bean counting POV a UH-1Y, H-60 family or UH-72 would fit the bill and bring in another supply chain need but hey it’s only money who cares. 

 

The H-1Y and UH-72 did not meet requirements for payload or range. The H-60 lost to the 139 because Boeing's bid was close to $5 billion cheaper.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would build one in 48th or 35th.  Its a good looking bird and my father was a missilier and flew in those uh-1s so would be neat to build the replacement for me.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Clinstone said:

 

The H-1Y and UH-72 did not meet requirements for payload or range. The H-60 lost to the 139 because Boeing's bid was close to $5 billion cheaper.

 

Thanks for the info. Like I said I didn’t read the details. Hope the AF is happy with the bird.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Considering Boeing's crap going on with the 737max, maybe their bid was lower because they are cheapening up everything to the point that the quality of the product is getting worse and safety is being compromised. 

I work in a manufacturing setting, and I can tell you first hand that:

1) Cheaper isn't always better 

2) Cheapening things up in order to make more money is the mindset now!

 

Tim

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
11 hours ago, hawkwrench said:

Considering Boeing's crap going on with the 737max, maybe their bid was lower because they are cheapening up everything to the point that the quality of the product is getting worse and safety is being compromised. 

I work in a manufacturing setting, and I can tell you first hand that:

1) Cheaper isn't always better 

2) Cheapening things up in order to make more money is the mindset now!

 

Tim

BA submitted surprisingly low bids for this program, the AF's new trainer and the Navy's carrier based UAV.   Seems to be a new strategy with them to win the work at all costs and either change order your way to profitability or make up for the losses on the long-term O&M support contracts.   

Edited by 11bee

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Most of the development work has already been completed by Leonardo after their work for the HH-139. The fist aircraft is scheduled to be delivered to the Air Force in early FY20, only a year after the contract was awarded.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On ‎8‎/‎9‎/‎2019 at 1:31 AM, Loach Driver said:

It's a helicopter that is in widespread use around the globe. With a bit of luck, we might now get a 1/72 kit of the 139.

 

LD.

Ditto!!!!:thumbsup:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On ‎8‎/‎9‎/‎2019 at 2:59 PM, 11bee said:

 

A general support helo that will never be deployed in combat (similar to the Army's Lakota) is way down my list of wants.   

I understand 11bee, but you would definitely enjoy the countless possibilities for civil liveries, now wouldn't you?!?:scared0016:

:cheers:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, GeejeeZ said:

I understand 11bee, but you would definitely enjoy the countless possibilities for civil liveries, now wouldn't you?!?:scared0016:

:cheers:

Lol....  I like my helos in grungy CARC!   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
25 minutes ago, 11bee said:

Lol....  I like my helos in grungy CARC!   

:thumbsup:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A little bit better bait....guns.

Pic from the web.

 

Irish Air Corps         Agusta Westland AW139      274

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice image - got the winch as well which isn't on the one I photographed.

Night shoots give you the opportunity to be a little artistic 😀

northolt-april2012-11.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Surprised Italeri hasn’t done a 1/72 kit. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hopefully, licencing isn't an issue when it comes to Italeri or anyone else kitting this helicopter. 

 

LD.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On ‎8‎/‎15‎/‎2019 at 12:58 AM, Tank said:

Surprised Italeri hasn’t done a 1/72 kit. 

Guess you're right: Italeri would be the only mainstream manufacturer that could kit this in some Italian military livery. Man, I could use tons of them: countless possibilities for offshore and EMS liveries. I am not too positive though: mainstream kit makers seem to be in a 'helicopter kits are poor sellers- mode' and chicken out of these subjects more and more...:angry:

 

On BritModeller I read that Whirly Bits from UK had actually thought about an AW139 release but was still too afraid that Italeri or Revell would release one eventually.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...