agelos2005 Posted April 24, 2020 Share Posted April 24, 2020 Hi guys I wanted to ask why the F-14D has assymeteical GBU load out with GBU-12 and GBU-16 on the front Phoenix pulins and one GBU-16 at the aft? I am doing the tamiya F-14D and that's what they offer with the Phoenix missile Is it with weight distribution? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
GW8345 Posted April 24, 2020 Share Posted April 24, 2020 1 hour ago, agelos2005 said: Hi guys I wanted to ask why the F-14D has assymeteical GBU load out with GBU-12 and GBU-16 on the front Phoenix pulins and one GBU-16 at the aft? I am doing the tamiya F-14D and that's what they offer with the Phoenix missile Is it with weight distribution? The asymmetric loading was due to weapon carriage restrictions with being able to mix GBU-12 and GBU-16's on the belly. You were allowed to put a GBU-12 and GBU-16 side by side but not fore and aft of each other. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
agelos2005 Posted April 24, 2020 Author Share Posted April 24, 2020 Thank you Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Niels Posted April 24, 2020 Share Posted April 24, 2020 5 hours ago, GW8345 said: The asymmetric loading was due to weapon carriage restrictions with being able to mix GBU-12 and GBU-16's on the belly. You were allowed to put a GBU-12 and GBU-16 side by side but not fore and aft of each other. So do I understand you correctly they had to have the GBU-16 on one side and GBU-12 on the other? Ie right side only 16's and 12's on left side? Or was the solution right forward GBU-16, left forward GBU-12, right rear GBU-12, left rear GBU-16? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
GW8345 Posted April 24, 2020 Share Posted April 24, 2020 1 minute ago, Niels said: So do I understand you correctly they had to have the GBU-16 on one side and GBU-12 on the other? Ie right side only 16's and 12's on left side? Or was the solution right forward GBU-16, left forward GBU-12, right rear GBU-12, left rear GBU-16? GBU-12's on ones side, i.e left side, GBU-16's on the other side, i.e., right side. You were not allowed to load one in front of the other, ie, GBU-16's on the fron rails and GBU-12's on the back rails. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Niels Posted April 24, 2020 Share Posted April 24, 2020 Thank you very much, this is most helpful for upcoming project 😎👍 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
agelos2005 Posted April 24, 2020 Author Share Posted April 24, 2020 Great info Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Niels Posted April 24, 2020 Share Posted April 24, 2020 Checked some of the reference photos I've downloaded from the net, and seems that atleast later in service life it was possible to load 2x GBU-38 or GBU-12's on front pallets? Do you have more details on this please? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
GW8345 Posted April 24, 2020 Share Posted April 24, 2020 56 minutes ago, Niels said: Checked some of the reference photos I've downloaded from the net, and seems that atleast later in service life it was possible to load 2x GBU-38 or GBU-12's on front pallets? Do you have more details on this please? For GBU-38/GBU-12 loading you can mix GBU-38 and GBU-12's. However, if you have two of the same they have to be either all on one side or all on the front / rear rails. Basically, you can't do GBU-12/38 on the front rails and GBU-12/38 on the back rails. Example; 2 x GBU-12 and 1 x GBU-38 would be loaded as; Front Rails - GBU-12 any back rail - GBU-38 or Left side (front & back) - GBU-12 Right side Front - GBU-38 If you have three bombs loaded, the forward rails have to be loaded and your choice of which back rail (provided the front rails are loaded with the same type weapon). Note: Only VF-31 and VF-213 were authorized to carry the GBU-38 with any other weapon on the belly. VF-101 was authorized to carry the GBU-38 for testing only, no mix loading was authorized). Quote Link to post Share on other sites
GW8345 Posted April 24, 2020 Share Posted April 24, 2020 IMPORTANT UPDATE: Upon further research, you can put GBU-12's on the front rails and GBU-16's on the back rails. You could not put GBU-12 and GBU-16 together on the front rails and you were not allowed to have one GBU-12 on the front and two GBU-16's on the back. If you had three bombs, both forward rails had to be loaded and then any aft rail could be loaded (provided the forward rails were the same type weapon). Quote Link to post Share on other sites
agelos2005 Posted April 24, 2020 Author Share Posted April 24, 2020 So tamiya insteuctions are wrong? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
GW8345 Posted April 24, 2020 Share Posted April 24, 2020 (edited) 1 hour ago, agelos2005 said: So tamiya insteuctions are wrong? Not surprising, most load out instructions you see on model instructions aren't factual. (this does not apply to the current aftermarket decal companies, they actually do their research and get info from "people in the know") They tend to lean to what the aircraft is capable of carrying, not what it's authorized, two different things. I had to look up the flight clearance for the GBU-38 and when I was searching for it I came across the GBU-12/16 flight clearance which made me re-exam what the manual states, that's when I noticed my original post was wrong. The flight manuals are written by engineers and we all know engineers are not known for their grasp of the English language or being able to write things that are easy to read, trying to figure mix loading will make your eyes bleed and head explode.😉 Edited April 24, 2020 by GW8345 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
agelos2005 Posted April 24, 2020 Author Share Posted April 24, 2020 So i can put two gbu-12 front and one GBU-16 back? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Niels Posted April 24, 2020 Share Posted April 24, 2020 Thanks GW8345, excellent information🤩 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
GW8345 Posted April 24, 2020 Share Posted April 24, 2020 1 hour ago, agelos2005 said: So i can put two gbu-12 front and one GBU-16 back? Yes sir👍 51 minutes ago, Niels said: Thanks GW8345, excellent information🤩 My pleasure👍 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Niels Posted April 25, 2020 Share Posted April 25, 2020 VF-2 flew the F-14D until retirement - did the loadouts you provide apply for them too? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
GW8345 Posted April 25, 2020 Share Posted April 25, 2020 (edited) 20 minutes ago, Niels said: VF-2 flew the F-14D until retirement - did the loadouts you provide apply for them too? VF-2 transitioned in 2003 so they weren't around for the GBU-38, it wasn't cleared until 2005 so only VF-31 and VF-213 were cleared to employ them. Edited April 25, 2020 by GW8345 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Joe Hegedus Posted April 25, 2020 Share Posted April 25, 2020 18 minutes ago, GW8345 said: VF-2 transitioned in 2003 so they weren't around for the GBU-38, it wasn't cleared until 2005 so only VF-31 and VF-213 were cleared to employ them. Yeah, for one whole cruise. Still not sure why they bothered to spend the money and effort for that. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Niels Posted April 25, 2020 Share Posted April 25, 2020 Thanks! 👍 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
GW8345 Posted April 25, 2020 Share Posted April 25, 2020 25 minutes ago, Joe Hegedus said: Yeah, for one whole cruise. Still not sure why they bothered to spend the money and effort for that. Because at the time they (Pentagon) wanted to reduce collateral damage and only wanted PGM's used, and here was "issues" with using LGB's. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Joe Hegedus Posted April 26, 2020 Share Posted April 26, 2020 It just seems like a lot of money spent for a one-time capability that was already existant in the air wing, just on another platform. Kinda like a political move to keep the aircraft relevant for the last cruise. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
bushande Posted May 11, 2020 Share Posted May 11, 2020 (edited) post deleted ... sorry Edited May 11, 2020 by bushande Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ijozic Posted May 13, 2020 Share Posted May 13, 2020 (edited) On 4/26/2020 at 5:41 PM, Joe Hegedus said: It just seems like a lot of money spent for a one-time capability that was already existant in the air wing, just on another platform. Kinda like a political move to keep the aircraft relevant for the last cruise. These things are planned and paid for in advance, I guess. IIRC, the Tomcat was supposed to have been kept for longer (2010, then 2007 and finally 2006), especially if the Super Hornet introduction got delayed due to some issues. Edited May 13, 2020 by ijozic Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.