southwestforests Posted May 8, 2022 Share Posted May 8, 2022 Scroll down and read "Your most memorable mission?" Looking for something about ground speed and flight lunches. https://hushkit.net/2022/05/08/life-and-death-in-the-delta-queen-my-time-on-the-b-58-hustler-supersonic-bomber/ Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Geoff M Posted May 8, 2022 Share Posted May 8, 2022 very interesting. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
southwestforests Posted May 8, 2022 Author Share Posted May 8, 2022 Several years back I got the B-58 Blunder book mentioned. It too is interesting. Is from 2015. Page 112 is, "The case of the A-10 Warthog -- another blunder in the making?" Backing up to earlier pages about B-58, top of page 63, " For the claim that B-58s were more expensive to operate, one would have to believe that the size of a B-52 Wing was the same size as a B-58 Wing. Not True. The two B-58 Wings each had 39 UE (unit equipped) B-58s assigned, whereas the six B-52 Wings had a normal complement of only 15 UE (unit equipped) B-52s assigned. ... Thirdly, a Top Secret report (now unclassified) estimated the annual operating costs of strategic bombers, including the associated cost for KC-135 tanker refueling support for both the B-52 and the B- 58. Surprisingly, it showed that the B-58, on an airplane-to-airplane basis was lest costly to operate. 25. " that 25 refers to a footnote. Author also addresses some myths about the B-58. One of them concerning low-level operations. Just below middle of page 72, " In Sept 1959, even before the B-58 entered the operational force, it flew three low altitude penetration flights. One four hour mission on Sept 18 included a two hour flight at .92 Mach (700 Mph) at 500 feet or less AGL (above ground level.) One portion was as low as 200 feet AGL. The low-level route started at Carswell AFB Texas and ended with a simulated bomb attack on Edwards AFB in California for a total of 1217 miles. It was noted to have been a smooth ride despite turbulence and showed that the B-58's delta wing with its low aspect ratio and strength was uniquely adaptable for low level, high speed, flight. 19.,40. " the 19 and 40 refer to footnotes Quote Link to post Share on other sites
GreyGhost Posted May 9, 2022 Share Posted May 9, 2022 And the B-58 could have easily been upgraded with newer engines with the engine nacelle/pylon design ... Interesting article, thanks SWF ... -Gregg Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ST0RM Posted May 9, 2022 Share Posted May 9, 2022 The bit about cutting the B-58s in favor of retaining older B-52s and ultimately losing them as well, is even present in today's Air Force. Cutting Here to save There and in the end, still losing overall. Great article! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.