Jump to content

Recommended Posts

No, I didn't say Bronco's fans - you Denver followers can drop this string right now.

Below is an OV-10G - a variation of the Bronco I had never known of until yesterday. The aircraft was at Marsh Aviation on Falcon Field, Mesa AZ.

From what little I could dig up, this was a Korean version of the OV-10.

What's unusual are the four bladed props, uprated - compact turbine engines, and some sort of optical site or range finder on the nose ahead of the cockpit.

Anyone with more details is welcome to chime in.

ATB -

- Rip -

IMG_0452A.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually I did find some photos of it on this site when it was a OV-10D with the Marine Corp back in 1989:

http://www.ov-10bronco.net/usmc-1.cfm

Also from the J. Baugher site it started as a OV-10A then was upgraded to OV-10D:

155492 (c/n 305-103, OV-10D) to AMARC as PA0012 Apr 16, 1993. Noted Oct 7, 2004 at Boeing Facility, Mesa, AZ, allegedly to go to Colombian AF.

Apparently it didn't go to Colombia.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Rip,

Did you get any other shots. Kinda hard to see the engines. Never saw a Bronco up close until 2000 at Patrick AFB. My wife and I had checked into the Holiday Inn in Cocoa Beach, while we were unpacking the car I heard an airplane sound like I'd never heard before. I looked to the south and saw the unmistakeable shape of two OV-10s. When we did our grocery shopping at Patrick later we drove by the two, they were black with red stripes as I recall. DEA I figured.

I'd love to get some stick time in one of those babies. I bet they are a blast to fly.

Wonder if Neil Burkill will see this thread!? :wave:

Chappie

Edited by Chappie
Link to post
Share on other sites

"DOS Airwing" - I'll bet it's one of the State Dept. anti-drug aircraft. It may have gone to Columbia, just not part of their Air Force. And it looks like the sponsons have been removed from the fuselage and armor plating added on the sides of the cockpit.

Edited by Trigger74
Link to post
Share on other sites

The mystery "sight" mounted on the nose is actually the GPS Cylon

light used to indicate end of "row" when spraying defoliant... ;^) It

lights up to indicate where to begin a run and gives indication of

the row to lay down your favorite herbicide agent.

This airframe is pretty well documented photographically online. A

person posted probably ten or more images taken during the ramp

up.

By the way, what does S. Korea need with another target? Get real

guys, 300 mph doesn't an escape make....this is and will always be

a jungle bird...darting in and out of the trees. S. Korea...come on...

you are stuck in your D SLEP mindset.

Edited by ScaleAero
Link to post
Share on other sites

That's just an uprated OV-10D+

Marsh Aviation made a program to upgrade existing OV-10s of all variants, from As to D+s

Philippine Air Force OV-10As & OV-10Cs are receiving this same upgrade under the Service Life Extension Program (SLEP), and plans to bring back mothballed airframes to flight ready status.

I've never heard of South Korea being interested in the OV-10 at all, nor that I've heard of them having (or planning to buy) one...

Those armor plates & sensors on the nose are already installed on the State Dept. birds before receiving these upgrades

twozerotimed.jpg

Bowview.jpg

sideviewov10.jpg

closeup.jpg

Apparently, one of these two was lost in a crash, the pilot killed & the observer ejected. Initial reports says its engine failure, because the starboard engine caught fire, but the final report says its pure pilot error. Upon catching fire, the crew panicked, (never realizing that the OV-10 is still flying with one healthy engine), the observer ejected, sending the airplane on a spin, with the pilot still inside, pilot tries to steer it away from houses and crashes in a fishpond, but he wasn't able to eject in time... Ironically, this is practically the SAME scenario when we lost one of our few female combat ready pilots of the OV-10.

Tsk tsk tsk... When my father and his mates were still flying these planes, they always simulate these kind of scenario when teaching new pilots, and there are incidences that it really happened, but not one of them were lost in a crash of this cause, because that can still manage to fly the airplane, and keep their cool...

Edited by Hans
Link to post
Share on other sites

IMG_0452A.jpg

I'm shocked no one mentioned the broadcast "spreader" for defoliants. Look at the rear of the fuselage.

Note the plumbing on the aft of the fuselage.

There are two types of herbicide spray/spreader units on Brocos...A and D models and the retrofits to G.

They are like the one shown in an earlier photo or spray bars hung beneath the wing and prop wash for

a wider swath than the original unit.

state_ov-10d_spray_gear_from_left.jpg

bf99_airshow_ov-10d_right_rear_burin028_25.jpg

Here is a closer look at the "Cylon" eye used as a visual indicator of the GPS unit to indicate start and stop

point for the pilot or backseater to start and stop releasing defoliant spray/spreading.

state_ov-10d_top_nose.jpg

For current events and configurations of the Bronco visit the OV-10 Bronco Association web site to obatin

not only text descriptions but the latest factual images related to the most recent configurations.

JamiMari10Drvr.jpg

Jami Mari, my daughter is producing a documentary, "OV-10, The Life & Death Of A Warbird". This project is

expected to be released in late September of '06. Focused on the Men, Mission, and Mechanics of the OV-10,

you are placed in the cockpit, on the tarmac maintaining and living with this greying War Horse.

Bronco Association: http://www.ov-10bronco.net/

Edited by ScaleAero
Link to post
Share on other sites

Those are interesting pics of Phil AF OV-10s. I've always had an interest in OV-10s and have the Cutting Edge decal sheet to represent the 16th Attack Squadron of the Phil AF. They had a very much different scheme, and a different sharks mouth on the front. Thanks for posting those as well.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Those shots of the black OV-10s look like the ones I saw at Patrick AFB in 2000.

It does not seem to me the armor plating would much for protecting anything but the crew's legs.

Chappie

Link to post
Share on other sites
It does not seem to me the armor plating would much for protecting anything but the crew's legs.

I guess it would really depend on the relative positions of the shooter and the Bronco; anything that keeps small arms fire outside the cockpit.

Link to post
Share on other sites
×
×
  • Create New...