Jump to content

Paul Boyer

Members
  • Content Count

    1,072
  • Joined

  • Last visited

2 Followers

About Paul Boyer

  • Rank
    Full Blown Model Geek
  • Birthday 05/26/1949

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Weeesconsin
  • Interests
    1/72 scale U.S. military aircraft, Rickenbacker bass guitars, birding, trivia

Recent Profile Visitors

11,350 profile views
  1. If he is going to use spray cans, he's going to have trouble locating the correct SAC colors.😕
  2. Yes, the Marines used TF-9J as fast FAC in Nam. Probably not many, but they were there! (1/72 scale Sword kit.)
  3. One you might consider is F-86A 49-1319 flown by Capt. James Jabara on 20 May 1951 shooting down his fifth and sixth MiG-15s to become America's first "jet ace." This would have had the early black-and-white stripes, not the later black-bordered yellow bands.
  4. I'll challenge your statement that the F-101 and F-102 "never flew in anger." But I get your point. On the Navy side Furies, Cutlass, Skyray, Cougar, Tiger, Demon weren't in combat and have been pretty well represented in plastic (yeah, I know, no decent Tiger in 1/48 yet). The USAF's F-89 Scorpion has seen its share of styrene as well.
  5. I remember seeing a published shot of the newly arrived (?) Thunderbird F-4Es flying in formation with no wing-tip stripes, just the bird on the bottom.
  6. This was a carryover from the F-100 days. It didn't take long for the soot to build up and they eventually just left it on as a badge of courage for the Slot Pilot. Maintenance crews would clean the soot from the fuselage, but let it build up on the tail.
  7. I don't know about colors, but you realize that you won't be able to see the crew when your model is finished, right?😊🤔
  8. Norm Filer is probably welling up right now! Wow!
  9. If it was "reboxed" by Ace, it was probably an Ace original. Revell issued a lot of Ace kits.
  10. I should think the gun would work if properly aimed. The Navy's CWIS (?) is a gatling gun designed to shoot down incoming anti-ship missiles, so . . . .
  11. The thing I question is wouldn't the gun be a better solution? A lot less expensive than a million (?) dollar missile against an non-maneuvering, simple flying bomb. I dunno.
×
×
  • Create New...