![]() ![]() |
Aug 7 2008, 08:46 PM
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Problem? Group: Admin Posts: 63244 Joined: 24-June 03 From: Bohemian Grove Member No.: 10 |
I was just over at the IPMS/USA site, and I see that there's some type of flyer at MRC's table. Any test shots, mock-ups, or news as of yet?
|
|
|
|
Aug 7 2008, 11:57 PM
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Crew Chiefs get all the chicks!! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 795 Joined: 24-June 03 From: Bel Air MD USA Member No.: 41 |
Just a sign saying it will have 275+ parts, Full weapon bay detail, AIM-9X,AIM-9l/M,AIM-120C and JDAMS. I will press for more info tommorow!
|
|
|
|
Aug 8 2008, 02:30 AM
Post
#3
|
|
![]() But I don't want no tea, it gives me a head ache... ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 854 Joined: 1-September 06 From: Live Free or Die Member No.: 7718 |
Wow, 275+ parts. Excellent collection of weapons. While you're pressing for more info, how about finding when the projected release date is.
|
|
|
|
Aug 8 2008, 08:25 AM
Post
#4
|
|
![]() Problem? Group: Admin Posts: 63244 Joined: 24-June 03 From: Bohemian Grove Member No.: 10 |
|
|
|
|
Aug 8 2008, 08:38 AM
Post
#5
|
|
|
ARC Night Shift Group: Admin Posts: 8915 Joined: 23-June 03 From: West Coast of Canada Member No.: 1 |
This is good news!!!
|
|
|
|
Aug 8 2008, 11:45 AM
Post
#6
|
|
![]() Life Member (Mon-Key Handler) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3918 Joined: 3-May 04 From: Columbus Ohio Member No.: 2537 |
275 parts for basically a simple airframe.
They must be doing a boatload of weapons or going into extreme detail on engine nozzles and wheel and weapons bay detailing Keep digging....we still have this Revell 48th F-14B to figure out! Matt |
|
|
|
Aug 8 2008, 05:42 PM
Post
#7
|
|
![]() Heavy loadouts... every time! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3756 Joined: 15-November 03 From: Des Moines, IA Member No.: 1528 |
I'm looking forward to the news/pics on this one A LOT!
jb |
|
|
|
Aug 8 2008, 06:12 PM
Post
#8
|
|
|
Willsp01 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 416 Joined: 22-July 07 From: uk, cheshire Member No.: 10498 |
is it 1/72?
|
|
|
|
Aug 8 2008, 06:21 PM
Post
#9
|
|
|
Life Member (Mon-Key Handler) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2897 Joined: 22-January 04 From: Haverhill, Mass. Member No.: 1871 |
275 parts for basically a simple airframe. They must be doing a boatload of weapons or going into extreme detail on engine nozzles and wheel and weapons bay detailing Keep digging....we still have this Revell 48th F-14B to figure out! Matt A boatload of weapons would be nice. You've gotta figure they're putting in at least 6 Slammers, and 2 of each kind of AIM-9. In most kits that could be up to 100 parts right there (missile body, missile endcap, plus 8 fins for each AMRAAM; missile body, missile endcap, plus 8 fins for each Sidewinder.) Now for some PURE SPECULATION. I'M NOT AT THE NATS, AND HAVE NO IDEA WHAT THIS KIT IS GOING TO LOOK LIKE!!! I'd kinda like if they went the way of the Fine Molds Millenium Falcon. That is, keep the major parts (gear and weapon bays) relatively undetailed, but add the wiring, hoses, etc as separate pieces. That way, you could paint them all before assembly, which could make things easier, but could make the fit a little scary. They could also be adding one or 2 full engines, which again, would raise the parts count a lot. Adding both extended and retracted weapon trapezes would also up the part count. I could also see open and closed engine petals, a decal-sandwich instrument panel, multiple pilot heads, positionable control surfaces, etc. Honestly with these possibilities, and with a decent compliment of weapons, 275 parts doesn't sound that outlandish. I just hope they don't split the main airframe components into like 10 separate parts. I think many modelers will be using metalic paints to finish this Raptor, and the fewer seams, the better. That's one thing Italeri had (almost) right. They kept the main airframe parts big. |
|
|
|
Aug 8 2008, 06:38 PM
Post
#10
|
|
![]() Heavy loadouts... every time! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3756 Joined: 15-November 03 From: Des Moines, IA Member No.: 1528 |
I agree with that- keep the main fuselage parts as Top n Bottom. Any more than that, and you run the risk of funky joints, seams to fill and sand, lines to join up, etc. A detailed cockpit, weapons bays, and some good weapons would be the things I'd want to see out of it. Considering there are already aftermarket decals, that's not such a concern to me.
I LOVE the idea of the landing gear having the hoses, etc. as separate components- what a great way to be able to detail them. jb |
|
|
|
Aug 8 2008, 08:08 PM
Post
#11
|
|
![]() Life Member (Mon-Key Handler) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 4501 Joined: 20-September 07 From: lost in the spares bin Member No.: 10937 |
275+ parts?
What the heck!?!?!?! That is insane! |
|
|
|
Aug 8 2008, 08:37 PM
Post
#12
|
|
![]() Crew Chiefs get all the chicks!! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 795 Joined: 24-June 03 From: Bel Air MD USA Member No.: 41 |
Talked to the rep today, it could be released in about three months! He was very apologetic and a little upset that he did not have test shots to display. Also the exhaust nozzles will be positionable.
|
|
|
|
Aug 8 2008, 09:15 PM
Post
#13
|
|
|
Life Member (Mon-Key Handler) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2897 Joined: 22-January 04 From: Haverhill, Mass. Member No.: 1871 |
wait... it's 3 months away, and they don't have some kind of advertisement at the NATIONAL CONVENTION?! This says a couple possibilities to me, both of which are very worrisome:
1.) Academy knows they're putting out a poor product, but it's just barely better than the Italeri, so folks will choose it. They just don't want to listen to all the complaints about the shape being so far off. 2.) They haven't done test shots yet, which means there's no way in hell it'll be released in 3 months. Of course, this could just be me being pessimistic, which has been known to happen. Craig (or really, anyone at the convention), ASK HIM MORE QUESTIONS!!! See if he can tell you about some of the stuff brought up on this board. -Will the airframe be big pieces? -Where the heck are they getting 275 pieces from?! -Any word on pricing? -any other information you can get!!! Thanks to anyone at the Nats. |
|
|
|
Aug 8 2008, 09:45 PM
Post
#14
|
|
![]() What the deuce???? ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1655 Joined: 8-December 06 From: an ambulance in Las Vegas, NV Member No.: 8595 |
|
|
|
|
Aug 8 2008, 11:33 PM
Post
#15
|
|
![]() Devoid of ANY Social Life ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 5062 Joined: 16-June 07 From: Menifee, Ca. USofA Member No.: 10186 |
wait... it's 3 months away, and they don't have some kind of advertisement at the NATIONAL CONVENTION?! This says a couple possibilities to me, both of which are very worrisome: Kinda sounds like the Trumpy 1/32 A-6 routine. Hope not. I really look forward to more kits of the Raptor becoming available. Still hopeing and 1.) Academy knows they're putting out a poor product, but it's just barely better than the Italeri, so folks will choose it. They just don't want to listen to all the complaints about the shape being so far off. 2.) They haven't done test shots yet, which means there's no way in hell it'll be released in 3 months. Of course, this could just be me being pessimistic, which has been known to happen. |
|
|
|
Aug 9 2008, 01:24 AM
Post
#16
|
|
![]() Heavy loadouts... every time! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3756 Joined: 15-November 03 From: Des Moines, IA Member No.: 1528 |
wait... it's 3 months away, and they don't have some kind of advertisement at the NATIONAL CONVENTION?! This says a couple possibilities to me, both of which are very worrisome: 1.) Academy knows they're putting out a poor product, but it's just barely better than the Italeri, so folks will choose it. They just don't want to listen to all the complaints about the shape being so far off. 2.) They haven't done test shots yet, which means there's no way in hell it'll be released in 3 months. Of course, this could just be me being pessimistic, which has been known to happen. Craig (or really, anyone at the convention), ASK HIM MORE QUESTIONS!!! See if he can tell you about some of the stuff brought up on this board. -Will the airframe be big pieces? -Where the heck are they getting 275 pieces from?! -Any word on pricing? -any other information you can get!!! Thanks to anyone at the Nats. I think you're being pessimistic Also, he said it "could be" released as soon as 3 months. If we've learned anything from any other manufacturer (kinetic) then we know that things can sometimes get pushed back. Before we freak out, let's see the test shots. Hopefully we'll all be happy with them, though just knowing some of my comrades on here jb |
|
|
|
Aug 9 2008, 01:33 AM
Post
#17
|
|
|
GO CANADA! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 4516 Joined: 30-August 03 From: Moncton, NB, Canada Member No.: 1032 |
|
|
|
|
Aug 9 2008, 06:42 AM
Post
#18
|
|
![]() 114th FS nut and F-15C whore. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1431 Joined: 20-December 04 From: Oregon Member No.: 3844 |
I'd prefer to be optimistic here.
Imagine if people had been so negative before the 1/32 Hornet came out...or were they? |
|
|
|
Aug 9 2008, 09:00 PM
Post
#19
|
|
|
away from the forum ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2368 Joined: 3-April 05 Member No.: 4606 |
wait... it's 3 months away, and they don't have some kind of advertisement at the NATIONAL CONVENTION?! This says a couple possibilities to me, both of which are very worrisome: 1.) Academy knows they're putting out a poor product, but it's just barely better than the Italeri, so folks will choose it. They just don't want to listen to all the complaints about the shape being so far off. 2.) They haven't done test shots yet, which means there's no way in hell it'll be released in 3 months. Of course, this could just be me being pessimistic, which has been known to happen. 3. Or maybe they forgot to send the test shots to the rep in time, or they got lost in transport, won't be the first time something like that happened. I really don't get this attitude, no one has seen anything on this kit except for the announcement and desktop model that were on display at Nuremburg earlier this year. Yet already it's been mentioned that the kit may be of poor quality. Why don't we wait until the kit is released before this goes any further? Ken |
|
|
|
Aug 9 2008, 09:29 PM
Post
#20
|
|
![]() Zeppelin Technologies Group: If you float it, we fold it! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3158 Joined: 24-June 03 Member No.: 72 |
okay, so since the interest level is so high, I spent some time talking to the rep todAy and going over some of the details, particularly some of the real persnickety details. After a long discussion, pretty much one thing is absolutely certain about this kit:
It will look like a Raptor. |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 10th September 2010 - 08:39 PM |