Jump to content
ARC Discussion Forums
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt

gibo2016

Members
  • Content Count

    36
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About gibo2016

  • Rank
    Glue Required

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Guys do you have any more pics of this thing other than what google images normally shows? See about 4 images. That's it. Just need to confirm if this baby had it's IRST on the middle or on the side like the Su-27SMs now. Appreciate the help 925-750x350 by timothy33csa, on Flickr
  2. Wow. Thank you so much Kotey. That really helps. Thank you thank you
  3. Gents, by some miracle, do any of you happen to know the bort number for this bad boy? su-27sm3 siria identificación rojo 55 (1) by timothy33csa, on Flickr su-27sm3 siria identificación rojo 55 by timothy33csa, on Flickr According to the site I took that pic from, it's most likely "Red 55". But there's a serial number below it. Do you guys know? I've been trying to findout but no dice. So far the only good pics I see is from Red 62 4413372_original1 by timothy33csa, on Flickr
  4. Hello guys. I'm gonna show you a model. I just want to know if such really existed or if it's completely fictional. Hope someone can help me out helicoptero-us-army-uh-1b-n-64-13912-vietnam-during-1967-easy-model-di-36907_4_1200 by timothy33csa, on Flickr Don't mind the "AMRY". Just wanna know if the rest is true
  5. Thanks aspret. I have another problem though. I didn't think of this before but, should the markings be indented the same way on the other side? What I mean is this tigers by timothy33csa, on Flickr Do you think it should be number 1 where the portside and starboard have the same indent, or number 2 where it should be the opposite. Cause I see some aircraft are like number 1 and some have markings indented like number 2
  6. Thanks Hooker169. Too bad though. I really liked the scheme. But if I can't get the names, I might just go for the one on your pic
  7. Hello guys. I wanna do this scheme so bad but unfortunately the quality isn't really top notch. I cannot fully read the pilots' names on it. 67-14920 37BS 28 BW by timothy33csa, on Flickr I think the first one reads as " MAJ RALPH _______ The other reads as _______ STEVE RUSSEL. What do you think
  8. I've misunderstood. Thanks. I see it now. I just googled Hwang + Fini flight and poof there she is. 85-0100 in the flesh with 2 kill marks.
  9. You can also use the Amercom Ah-1Z. It's basically a rip off of the Forces of Valor Viper. I've used that one to make an UH-1Y.
  10. Oh I see. Well I guess that settles it then. 85-0100 never had 2 kill markings at any time and no F-15 bearing the redhawk tailart with the number AF 85 - 100 wore those kill markings ever
  11. Oops may have spoken too soon. WHat do you mean by "that line jet"?
  12. Thanks gents. I guess 85-0100 is out of the question now. I would be doing 78-0473 instead
  13. Hello guys. I'm thinking of getting this kit. I'm interested in the markings of 85-0100. s-l1600 by timothy33csa, on Flickr As you can see Academy depicts it with 2 kill markings. I've seen another kit which shares the same markings. GBH IIRC correctly. Anyway I want to know if 85-0100 really did wear those 2 kill markins at one point. Only pics I can find in the net doesn't show it does 84908_1515231611 by timothy33csa, on Flickr Decals of the ACADEMY KIT. I could also opt for the other Oregon marking aca_12531_decals by timothy33csa, on Flickr
×
×
  • Create New...