Jump to content

Whales of Danang (VQ-1 EA-3B, 1970)


Recommended Posts

EA3BVQ1.jpg

Papa Romeo Four (My Dad's bird) based at NAS Atsugi, Japan on monthly DETs to Danang (for him)

'70-'71.

EA3BSnoutVQ1.jpg

Snout detail.

RA3VAP61.jpg

Seen at NAS Alameda in 1968, eventually VAP-61 sent these birds to Vietnam

RA3snout.jpg

More snout detail.

KA3VAH4.jpg

Heavy 4 KA-3B Skywarrior, USS Kitty Hawk, 1968

RA3BBLKVAP61.jpg

RA-3B VAP-61, seen at Danang, RSVN in 1968

Tanker of Heavy 11 is next in the que.

Happy Holidays to all of you.

Regards,

Stephen

Edited by mudrat
Link to post
Share on other sites
It does indeed :cheers:

Why were they called 'whales'?

'Cause they were the biggest damn aircraft on the the boat!

Seriously, the fuselage of the A-3 is the same length as the B-17. This should give some indication of it's size.

The Forrestall class carrier was developed specifically to handle this a/c. The reason for the A-3 being so large,

was the large size of the nuke weapon casings at the time of the A-3's development.

Their actual name was Skywarrior.

Regards,

Stephen

Edited by mudrat
Link to post
Share on other sites
That must have been a lot of fun to land on a moving carrier.. :o

I can't comment on trapping an A-3, (my dad can, though) but I can say they were

usually the last birds to trap on a given cycle (that I have seen), due, in part to the difficulty of other a/c taxiing around the A-3, if it had not been imediately spotted.

Stephen

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice work! I've never seen this grey camo before! Do you have any photos of it? I'm really interested to the whales I always found it an interesting and exotic aircraft. If you see them on "early" carriers, from bird's view, it's hard to believe they were operating from there :)

Were the able to carry those actualy nuclear weapons why they were design this huge?

Greetings, neu :rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Were the able to carry those actualy nuclear weapons why they were design this huge?

Neu, I cannot answer why nuclear weapons were so large. I have to assume they, like computers,

were large, crude (by today's standards) and inefficient, until designs were refined by technological improvements or maybe the larger nukes were a higher yield (in the double digit megaton range) as opposed to today's smaller yield tactical nukes like the B-61 (in the low kiloton range).

I know the A-3 stopped being a bomb delivery vehicle in the mid to late '60s as more a/c became available

to carry the smaller tactical nukes.

I sure an internet search could better answer your question.

Stephen

Edited by mudrat
Link to post
Share on other sites
Nice work! I've never seen this grey camo before! Do you have any photos of it? I'm really interested to the whales I always found it an interesting and exotic aircraft. If you see them on "early" carriers, from bird's view, it's hard to believe they were operating from there :)

Were the able to carry those actualy nuclear weapons why they were design this huge?

Greetings, neu :wave:

Grab one of the Koku fan specials as they have photos of this scheme.

Ginters "Fleet Whales" in his Naval Fighters #46 has shots as well.

The bomb bay was designed for a 66 in diameter weapon.

bill

Link to post
Share on other sites
Bill,

I've been toying with the idea of doing the black VAP-61 bird, but I have some other

tanker to do, 1st.

See the KA-3 I just added above.

Regards,

Stephen

Looks good!

The Heavy 4 tankers are neat as they have a fuselage stripe

for each number in the modex.

Edited by Phantomologist
Link to post
Share on other sites
Did your Dad fly any of the Army missions

with the jets that had the small cheeks and

all the extra shark fin antennas on the sides

of the fuselage and clustered on top?

Bill, no he did not. He did have an Army Sigint Evaluator on board on most missions, though.

This was both in Vietnam or off the North Korean & Chinese coasts.

His birds always had the big canoe under the fuselage and the CLE wing.

Regards,

Stephen

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...