Jump to content

F-16C block 40 Barak question


Recommended Posts

Good question, Eli. I'm really eager to see whether somebody can shed a light on that matter.

This much is clear, a few had some. At least...

So far, I haven't been able to identify any consistent system in reinforcement plate intallation on Barak II A/C, though.

"506" had only the rear H-shaped stiffeners in 2004, the same for "512" plus strengthening plates at the stabilizer roots in 2008.

In 2013 "525" was completely devoid of fuselage stiffeners, only depicting the stabilizer root strengthening plates.

Cheers,

Erik

Link to post
Share on other sites

Something's just crossed my mind...

As to the manufacturing timeline, Israeli Block 40 positively coincide with early USAF Block 50/50A. Given this, some of the Block 50's structural improvements may have been carried over to the Barak II during manufacturing. Moreover, compared with their US Block 40 counterparts, the Barak's TOW is significantly higher.

The presence of TEC plates on individual airframes might be the result of a "ad hoc/repair as necessary" measure based on the actual wear and tear.

Cheers,

Erik

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...