Andrew Maverick Taylor Posted August 6, 2023 Share Posted August 6, 2023 (edited) I just came across a 2014 article showing testing of AIM-120 missiles on outboard wing pylons on the F-22 Raptor: https://www.ausairpower.net/raptor.html I know the F-22 can now be fitted with fuel tanks on the inboard wing pylons but I’d like to know if someone can identify the actual layout of the pylon setup in this photo from the article: Would it be safe to assume that they are the standard inboard tank pylons on the outboard store’s location with an additional same pylon with LAU-127 rails? Grateful for any input. Edited August 6, 2023 by Andrew Maverick Taylor Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Andrew Maverick Taylor Posted August 14, 2023 Author Share Posted August 14, 2023 BUMP Quote Link to post Share on other sites
foxmulder_ms Posted September 15, 2023 Share Posted September 15, 2023 Standard "main" pylons, which is connected to fuels tanks, is correct. LAU-127 rail is also correct. But! There is an F-22 specific adapter between these two when you look closely at the photo you can see it. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Andrew Maverick Taylor Posted September 16, 2023 Author Share Posted September 16, 2023 20 minutes ago, foxmulder_ms said: Standard "main" pylons, which is connected to fuels tanks, is correct. LAU-127 rail is also correct. But! There is an F-22 specific adapter between these two when you look closely at the photo you can see it. It’s the adapter between the LAU-127s that’s the difficult one to confirm. There doesn’t seem to be anything common in the USAF inventory that is recognisable. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
foxmulder_ms Posted September 16, 2023 Share Posted September 16, 2023 Indeed. Maybe it is relic of testing and USAF didn't even acquire it. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
mrvark Posted September 22, 2023 Share Posted September 22, 2023 On 9/15/2023 at 7:43 PM, foxmulder_ms said: LAU-127 rail is also correct. A small point. the LAU-127 is a Navy launcher and incorporates a nitrogen bottle in the aft end for use by their AIM-9Ms that causes a bulge on the sides of the launcher. It's clear from the photo that the launchers on the F-22 lack that bulge. That aside, it would make more sense to use the F-15's LAU-128 unless they've developed an F-22 unique launcher with new nomenclature. (I also discount the F-16's LAU-129 because of the way it mounts to their pylons/airframe.) Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Andrew Maverick Taylor Posted September 22, 2023 Author Share Posted September 22, 2023 11 minutes ago, mrvark said: A small point. the LAU-127 is a Navy launcher and incorporates a nitrogen bottle in the aft end for use by their AIM-9Ms that causes a bulge on the sides of the launcher. It's clear from the photo that the launchers on the F-22 lack that bulge. That aside, it would make more sense to use the F-15's LAU-128 unless they've developed an F-22 unique launcher with new nomenclature. (I also discount the F-16's LAU-129 because of the way it mounts to their pylons/airframe.) Thanks for the correction. I’m planning on building a 1/48 Raptor in this configuration and did buy a set of the LAU-128s after noticing the difference between the Navy/USAF ones. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.