DarkKnight

are these fixable what are the flaws?

did they make most of the corrections?

I bought the Tarangus got replacement fin and canards and bought a generator , it seems less work than the esci

am I wrong, but you cant build a JA or AJ both unless you have 2 different length fuselages and 2 different tail fins

wow, big difference, wonder if any plans to update the SJ birds

ahh i see it, so I presume pilots like the 229s better?

thanks for the help guys, I get it now, Luftwaffe Phantoms always looked cool to me, always wondered why they bought such a "downgraded" version at first

are there external differences between 220 and 229 equipped jets?

the front sparrow bays look open to me, am i wrong?

any more news?

all I can say was the KH MiG-25 had issues that essentially could not be corrected, whereas the GWH has only a few minor ones. I think the direct input from modelers in this forum helps to create better kits, I hope the KH is perfect and even if its close but able to be corrected i will buy it. Its a great time for modeling with all the information we can get to make better replicas. I'm excited to see it, I only wish I could find soviet/russian pilots that work for me, many of the good figures have no oxygen mask on, the only time I see pilots in pictures w/o masks is in the movie Top Gun hahahahah

I am very concerned, the latest Su-35 is almost perfect because of input from some members of this forum, there was no active input for this kit so it may have problems!

^^thank you for the critique, I appreciate you sharing your knowledge with all of us, it is important for me to know what modifications are necessary to build an accurate replica. This seems much easier to "correct" than the KH, the fact that they updated the box art shows some listening which I hope is a good sign.

more accurate than the "unbuildable" Kitty Hawk I hope

^^^thats what happened to me