Touvdal

Very nice, build :D Build it myself 5-6 years ago, neede a lot of lead to stay on the nose. cheers Jes

How did you get that idea ??, compared your self ?? Here you can see no serious difference between the Acadamy left and Italery right. cheers Jes

Well the landing gear legs are actually the right, lenght have checked aganins the drawing. cheers Jes

For a number of years I have been hoping for a mainstream affordable F, but non so far accept the Italeri. But it has some serious issues that are visible to the naked eye. 1: Wheels to big 2: landing gear to wide 3: Spinner to flat and short 4: Panel lines and slats wrong 5: wheel well to wide, missing teardrop flaring. There might be more, but none that I consider serious. This is not a state of the art conversion, just a try to make it look like a F. So I thought I would try and see what I could do about it, without putting to much work into it. 1. Wheels had some in the spare par

Here you have a E-3 in 1/72 ICM cheers Jes

Very nice job, love the Fine Moulds new bourght one think they are to expessive, waiting for a mailstream issue. Regarding the yellow leading edge, never seen it that before, but just found this and I am now convinced. And it is a very interesting discovery. http://www.network54.com/Forum/149674/mess.../Hrabak%27s+F-2 http://www.network54.com/Forum/149674/mess.../Hrabak%27s+F-2 cheers Jes

The F Series has round, though some early F´s had square. cheers Jes

Nice to see an old Matchbox build. cheers Jes

Very nice cheers Jes

So finally finished, not an easy build mostly due to the fact that this kit has been overengeenered, a lot of unusable parts, to thin and fragile. So kit manufactores why not keep it simpel and accurate, and let up to the model builders weather they what to use extra money on detaling,. cheers Jes

Paint work almost inished done by brush, and ready for clear cote. cheers Jes

G2+GH a B-4

Very nice job, like the paint job cheers Jes