Ironhead Posted November 3, 2006 Share Posted November 3, 2006 I wonder what the DI is? It looks ungodly high. Link to post Share on other sites
Dan 88 Posted November 3, 2006 Share Posted November 3, 2006 Cool pics!! Come on Hasegawa I'm waiting for my Growler!!!! :o :lol: Link to post Share on other sites
Jay Chladek Posted November 3, 2006 Share Posted November 3, 2006 The Growler needs some better nose art. Something like a picture of Howard Stern or Rush Limbaugh might be appropriate for this flying jam session. :lol: Are they still going ahead with calling it the "Growler" though? I heard there was a movement to get it called the "Shocker" since the Navy term "growler" is something not all that desireable if somebody gets it hung on them. Then again it is yet another Hornet. Link to post Share on other sites
Skull Leader Posted November 3, 2006 Share Posted November 3, 2006 The Growler needs some better nose art. Something like a picture of Howard Stern or Rush Limbaugh might be appropriate for this flying jam session. :lol: Are they still going ahead with calling it the "Growler" though? I heard there was a movement to get it called the "Shocker" since the Navy term "growler" is something not all that desireable if somebody gets it hung on them. Then again it is yet another Hornet. Jay, the "Shocker" moniker that has been floating around is going to be an unofficial name (much like "Viper" for the F-16) Link to post Share on other sites
Joe Hegedus Posted November 3, 2006 Share Posted November 3, 2006 The first set of pictures are the markings for the roll out ceremony. All of the special markings except the red/orange triangles on the fins were removed shortly after that and before the 1st flight. Those fin markings are not red/orange. They're straight red. Personally, I think they could have come up with a better pattern for the fin than just a red triangle-it looks strange like that. FWIW, my sources tell me that EA-2, the second "G" prototype, will have blue on it instead of red. No idea what the pattern will be, but I'd guess the same as EA-1. The different colors are alledgedly to be able to visually tell the jets apart. Link to post Share on other sites
Joe Hegedus Posted November 3, 2006 Share Posted November 3, 2006 The Growler needs some better nose art. Something like a picture of Howard Stern or Rush Limbaugh might be appropriate for this flying jam session. :D Are they still going ahead with calling it the "Growler" though? I heard there was a movement to get it called the "Shocker" since the Navy term "growler" is something not all that desireable if somebody gets it hung on them. Then again it is yet another Hornet. ;) I dunno, the wolf's head is kinda cool. But the name's gotta go (not likely that will happen officially, though). Link to post Share on other sites
Chappie Posted November 3, 2006 Share Posted November 3, 2006 (edited) Yes, Growler name really sucks eggs. I'm sure if Pax gets a Shocker between now and May '07 either Joe or I will get walkarounds at the Andrews Open House. Unless some else gets them first. Chappie Edited November 3, 2006 by Chappie Link to post Share on other sites
jbrundt Posted November 3, 2006 Share Posted November 3, 2006 (edited) FWIW, my sources tell me that EA-2, the second "G" prototype, will have blue on it instead of red. No idea what the pattern will be, but I'd guess the same as EA-1. EA-2 just came out of paint and has only "522" on the flaps and no other colors than overall grey. It's pretty bland. I heard they were going to apply the blue prior to its departure to PAX. It'll be the same layout as EA-1's red markings. And just so you guys know these are not true G models. They are F models with G equipment. The "real" G's won't be flying until next year. The airframes are still in the jigs. Jeff Edited November 3, 2006 by jbrundt Link to post Share on other sites
Karl Sander Posted November 3, 2006 Share Posted November 3, 2006 I thought the ALQ-99s were going to be replaced by something newer? In the ICAP II Prowler, the ALQ-99 has two components - the OBS (on-board system - receivers) and TJS (Tactical Jamming System - transmitters). The OBS is replaced in ICAP III and Shocker by the ALQ-218. The pods are still ALQ-99 (though with upgraded boxes inside). Link to post Share on other sites
Karl Sander Posted November 3, 2006 Share Posted November 3, 2006 Maybe the Navy isn't ready to announce the replacement yet Jeremy .?.Karl would know ... but he ain't talkin' ... He could ... but then he'd ... well, ... you know ... Gregg ...have to get his stupid DSL router fixed? Yes. Link to post Share on other sites
Karl Sander Posted November 3, 2006 Share Posted November 3, 2006 EA-2 just came out of paint and has only "522" on the flaps and no other colors than overall grey. It's pretty bland. I heard they were going to apply the blue prior to its departure to PAX. It'll be the same layout as EA-1's red markings.And just so you guys know these are not true G models. They are F models with G equipment. The "real" G's won't be flying until next year. The airframes are still in the jigs. Jeff Um, I'll double check when I get back to work, but I don't think that's 100% accurate. It was my understanding from the guys I work with who are part of the FIT (Fighter Integration Team) and GTAT (G Tactics Analysis Team) that the one that got rolled out in August was an honest to goodness G. Link to post Share on other sites
Joe Hegedus Posted November 3, 2006 Share Posted November 3, 2006 Um, I'll double check when I get back to work, but I don't think that's 100% accurate. It was my understanding from the guys I work with who are part of the FIT (Fighter Integration Team) and GTAT (G Tactics Analysis Team) that the one that got rolled out in August was an honest to goodness G. No, he's 100% correct. EA-1 and EA-2 were bought under the current contract, they are "F" models as far as officialdom is concerned. The even have F/A-18F stenciled on the tail above the BuNo. They've got all the "G" mods and equipment, but for contract, maintenance, and logistics purposes they are "F" models. That's why they are being identified as EA-1 and EA-2 rather than G-1 and G-2. Those airplanes won't be flying for another year or so as I understand it. But SD521 and SD522 works for me... Break break... Chappie, we've had EA-1 at Pax for a bit over a month now and EA-2 is expected in a couple weeks. But I haven't got my photo badge renewed yet since the recent job shuffle, so I'm not able to get pix. No worries, though, as the gents from the photo lab would most likely be willing to help us out. You're still out there, aren't you Mike? Link to post Share on other sites
Karl Sander Posted November 3, 2006 Share Posted November 3, 2006 No, he's 100% correct. EA-1 and EA-2 were bought under the current contract, they are "F" models as far as officialdom is concerned. The even have F/A-18F stenciled on the tail above the BuNo. They've got all the "G" mods and equipment, but for contract, maintenance, and logistics purposes they are "F" models. That's why they are being identified as EA-1 and EA-2 rather than G-1 and G-2. Those airplanes won't be flying for another year or so as I understand it. But SD521 and SD522 works for me...Break break... Chappie, we've had EA-1 at Pax for a bit over a month now and EA-2 is expected in a couple weeks. But I haven't got my photo badge renewed yet since the recent job shuffle, so I'm not able to get pix. No worries, though, as the gents from the photo lab would most likely be willing to help us out. You're still out there, aren't you Mike? So.... the whole roll-out circus in August that a bunch of commanders and captains were getting all excited over was really kind of a load of garbage then??? Actually sounds about par for the course. (Admittedly, the EA-18G has not been the closest gator to my professional canoe as my focus is still on teaching people to fight the Prowler... well, aside from my subversive campaign to sabatoge the 5-sided s***-hole's choice of name...) Link to post Share on other sites
jbrundt Posted November 3, 2006 Share Posted November 3, 2006 For those of you playing at home: EA-1 is F134 and EA-2 is F135. Just as a comparison we've just delivered F170 & F171 to the Navy this week. EA-1 flew several times here before it went to PAX (see my in-flight shots posted a few replies up in this thread). EA-2 first flight is slated for this coming monday (11/6). We'll do a few flights here in the next month before it flies away to PAX at the end of December. Jeff Link to post Share on other sites
Dan 88 Posted November 3, 2006 Share Posted November 3, 2006 (edited) For those of you playing at home:EA-1 is F134 and EA-2 is F135. Just as a comparison we've just delivered F170 & F171 to the Navy this week. Jeff So what squadron got F170 and F171? Was it VFA-31?!?! Daniel Edited November 3, 2006 by Super Hornet 88 Link to post Share on other sites
Joe Hegedus Posted November 3, 2006 Share Posted November 3, 2006 For those of you playing at home:EA-1 is F134 and EA-2 is F135. Just as a comparison we've just delivered F170 & F171 to the Navy this week. EA-1 flew several times here before it went to PAX (see my in-flight shots posted a few replies up in this thread). EA-2 first flight is slated for this coming monday (11/6). We'll do a few flights here in the next month before it flies away to PAX at the end of December. Jeff Oh, they slipped it again? What we heard a couple days ago was first flight was gonna be attempted tomorrow, with ferry happening before Thanksgiving. But then, when was the last time a published schedule could be trusted? Kolja, I wouldn't say that the entire to-do was complete garbage, but it was likely spun quite a bit...Technically EA-1 and EA-2 are "F" models as far as the bean-counters are concerned, but as far as capability goes they're "G"s. Link to post Share on other sites
AnthonyWan Posted November 3, 2006 Share Posted November 3, 2006 <_< Can anyone comment on the accuracy of Italeri's kit compared to the read jet? Link to post Share on other sites
jbrundt Posted November 4, 2006 Share Posted November 4, 2006 So what squadron got F170 and F171? Was it VFA-31?!?! Daniel I believe one went to KNLC and the other to KNTU. I can't recall which one went where specifically. I'll have to check at work next week. Jeff Link to post Share on other sites
Zactoman Posted November 4, 2006 Share Posted November 4, 2006 Mary-Beth Jenkins, EA-6B, and this morning's duty... Name a howler, a prowler and a growler... Link to post Share on other sites
Karl Sander Posted November 5, 2006 Share Posted November 5, 2006 Name a howler, a prowler and a growler... I think I'd rather see a picture of said "howler" than Carnac... Link to post Share on other sites
Zactoman Posted November 5, 2006 Share Posted November 5, 2006 I think I'd rather see a picture of said "howler" than Carnac... May a love-starved yak find joy in your coffee cup... Link to post Share on other sites
Karl Sander Posted November 5, 2006 Share Posted November 5, 2006 May a love-starved yak find joy in your coffee cup... Great. Now even my coffee cup gets more action than I do. Link to post Share on other sites
Spongebob Posted November 5, 2006 Share Posted November 5, 2006 Great. Now even my coffee cup gets more action than I do. Sounds like you need to adjust your "# of teeth required" and "# of children" standards for life in Fallon.... Spongebob Link to post Share on other sites
Karl Sander Posted November 5, 2006 Share Posted November 5, 2006 Sounds like you need to adjust your "# of teeth required" and "# of children" standards for life in Fallon.... Spongebob I'm notoriously poor at adjusting... Link to post Share on other sites
Rodney Posted November 5, 2006 Share Posted November 5, 2006 Sounds like you need to adjust your "# of teeth required" and "# of children" standards for life in Fallon.... Spongebob Speaking of which, Karl I need to drop you a line. I'll be heading up your way in Jan. Is there any decent dining places in Fallon and things to do.... ok maybe not things to do. Rodney Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts