Jump to content

Things that get blown-up


Recommended Posts

This has become a story on the BBC today for some reason as apparently it`s been standard practice in Russia for a few years.

http://www.themoscowtimes.com/news/article...nes/416711.html

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12...n-military.html

Reminds me of the `Phantom Army` inflated in southern England that helped trick the German`s into thinking that Calais was still the intended site for D-Day.

Cheers, Ian

Link to post
Share on other sites

Like Julien, I don`t know why this suddenly became news.

As for the usefullness or otherwise, Cold War experiments were suspended as everything would be imolated in a nuclear fireburst, not a lot of point in decoys there.

Modern day; signatures are both masked and mimicked widely, the ability to fool sensors has been repeatedly demonstrated, in Britain `lights` are being used to make vehicles `disappear`, towed decoys are used to mask naval vessels, stealth hides jets from radar.

The Russian story is interesting and a little amusing, but I wouldn`t dismiss it out of hand.

Cheers, Ian

PS- love the bouncy castle idea, how cool would that be after a few beers. :worship:

Edited by Ian Buick
Link to post
Share on other sites
Good idea for the Mk I Eyeball, but modern sensors have the ability to tell the real deal from the fake. IR signature, radar reflectivity all are methods to see fact from fiction. Cool to have for a party decoration though!

The Serbs used far more primitive decoys than these in Kosovo, and they were embarrassingly effective.

We did this back in the 1940's so why its news now I dont know??

Well, we've had air planes since the 40's and new ones of those are still news. This is the latest generation of fake weapons.

Link to post
Share on other sites

From a visual standpoint, a blown up decoy does have its uses. In combat, a typical fighter plane normally doesn't have the IR detection gear or somebody on board to tell that what they are shooting at might be a fake. Or the attack being staged might have to be so lightning quick that a pilot can't afford to uplink his imagery to someone else to analyze the sensor data. Somebody mentioned Kosovo and Iraq did similar things during Desert Storm by rolling out fake mobile SCUDs to make the Scud hunting forces more confused.

While a photo analyst back at a base can take the time to interpret what is a fake or not, combat forces don't always have that luxury and a few minutes of confusion can make a difference in combat. It is a form of camouflage like anything else.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Good idea for the Mk I Eyeball, but modern sensors have the ability to tell the real deal from the fake. IR signature, radar reflectivity all are methods to see fact from fiction. Cool to have for a party decoration though!
They imitate the heat signature of combat units, fooling enemy infra-red detectors.

RCS signature is also preserved.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...